Dr. Dennis Byrski
Ehemaliger wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter
Innovation and Entrepreneurship Research
Arbeitsbereiche:
Innovationsökonomik, Wissenschaftsökonomik, empirische Industrieökonomik, Gesundheitsökonomik
Wissenschaftlicher Werdegang
10/2016 - 10/2021
Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter und Doktorand am Max-Planck-Institut für Innovation und Wettbewerb (Innovation and Entrepreneurship Research) und an der Munich Graduate School of Economics, LMU München
Titel der Dissertation: “From Scientific Research to Healthcare Markets – Empirical Essays on the Economics of Pharmaceutical Innovation”
09/2019 - 12/2019
Gastwissenschaftler am Laboratory for Innovation Science at Harvard (LISH), Harvard Business School
10/2013 - 02/2016
Studium der Volkswirtschaftslehre (M.Sc.), Universität zu Köln
sowie Tsinghua University (Peking, China)
10/2012 - 09/2013
Studium der Volkswirtschaftslehre (B.Sc.), Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf
10/2009 - 09/2012
Studium der Betriebswirtschaftslehre (B.Sc.), Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf
sowie Grenoble Graduate School of Business (Grenoble, Frankreich)
Beruflicher Werdegang
07/2016 - 09/2016
Praktikant, Frontier Economics, Köln
04/2016 - 06/2016
Praktikant, Bundeskartellamt (Grundsatzabteilung Ökonometrie), Bonn
02/2016 - 04/2016
Praktikant, Accenture Strategy, Berlin
03/2015 - 02/2016
Studentischer Mitarbeiter, Institut der Deutschen Wirtschaft (IW) im
Kompetenzfeld Tarifpolitik und Arbeitsbeziehungen, Köln
02/2013 - 08/2014
Studentischer Mitarbeiter, Verlagsgruppe Handelsblatt, Düsseldorf
04/2012 - 07/2012 und 04/2011 - 07/2011
Tutor und studentische Hilfskraft am Lehrstuhl für betriebswirtschaftliche Steuerlehre
der Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf
02/2012 - 04/2012
Praktikant, KPMG AG, Düsseldorf
Stipendien
Seit 05/2018
Science Production Function Society Fellow am Laboratory for Innovation Science at Harvard (LISH), Harvard Business School
2012 - 2016
Stipendium der Friedrich-Naumann-Stiftung für die Freiheit,
Begabtenförderung aus Mitteln des Bundesministeriums für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF)
2009 - 2011
NRW-Stipendium "Chancen Nutzen", Begabtenförderung aus Mitteln des Ministeriums für Innovation, Wissenschaft und Forschung des Landes NRW
Publikationen
Artikel in referierten Fachzeitschriften
Fire and Mice: The Effect of Supply Shocks on Basic Science, Academy of Management Proceedings, 2020 (1). DOI
(2020).- We study how a negative supply shock to research-related assets affects the production of scientific knowledge. In particular, we exploit the 1989 Morrell Park fire that destroyed a considerable share of the world's largest mice breeding facility, the Jackson Laboratory, and killed approximately 400,000 mice. This fire led to an unforeseen and substantial supply shortage in mice for the North American biomedical research community, which we can isolate at the strain and scientist level based on proprietary archival data. Using difference-in-differences estimations, we find that the scientific productivity of affected scientists decreases when measured in simple publication counts, but much less so when we adjust for the publications' quality. Moreover, affected researchers are more likely to initiate research that is unrelated to their previous work. This indicates that affected scientists switched research trajectories but maintained their scientific impact. In the aggregate, the temporary supply shortage of particular mice strains led to a permanent decrease in their usage among U.S.\ scientists. These results highlight the important role of supply chains in basic science."
IP-Based Incentives Against Antimicrobial Crisis: A European Perspective, IIC - international review of intellectual property and competition law, 50 (1), 30-76. DOI
(2019).- The field of antimicrobials is considered to be facing a crisis. Increasing
microbial resistance is creating a demand for new drugs, which however is not being
matched by privately funded R&D. The reasons for this market failure are of a
technical and economic nature. The present article analyzes what changes to IP-
based incentives are conceivable in the European Union (EU) in order to address the
antimicrobial crisis. Since the assessment of the suitability of the analyzed options
depends on interdisciplinary research, this article also proposes a research agenda to
be considered for the implementation of public policies in this field.
Herausgeberwerke
Study on the legal aspects of Supplementary Protection Certificates in the EU. Final report. Brussel: European Commission. DOI
(2018).Beiträge in Sammelwerken
Section 16.2 - Duration of the SPC (Art. 13 Reg. 469/2009) - Effective length of SPC protection, in: Roberto Romandini, Reto M. Hilty, Annette Kur (
Chapter 16 - Duration of the SPC (Art. 13 Reg. 469/2009), in: Roberto Romandini, Reto M. Hilty, Annette Kur (
Annex V - SPC Statistics to Chapter 7, in: Roberto Romandini, Reto M. Hilty, Annette Kur (
Chapter 7 - Overall Use of the SPC System in the EU, in: Roberto Romandini, Reto M. Hilty, Annette Kur (
Monographien
From Scientific Research to Healthcare Markets: Empirical Essays on the Economics of Pharmaceutical Innovation. DOI
(2021).- This dissertation offers new insights into the determinants of biomedical science and pharmaceutical innovation, each in a self-contained chapter. The first chapter investigates the functioning of research tool markets, which are important input factors into science. Specifically, it observes why short-term distortions to supply have enduring effects on tool adoption and, thus, the direction of scientific research. The second chapter examines whether pharmaceutical companies adjust their follow-on innovation activities when patentability standards increase. To this end, it analyses changes in the innovation incentives caused by a drug’s marketing authorization. The third chapter explores the relationship between downstream shifts in demand and upstream research. It studies whether a policy-induced increase in market size affects scientific publishing by universities and corporations. In summary, evidence from these micro-economic analyses may contribute to designing effective and efficient public policies that help stimulate R&D activities, foster the development of new pharmaceutical treatments, and eventually improve public health.
Flächentarifvertrag und Tarifpartnerschaft in Deutschland: Ein historischer Rückblick (IW-Analysen, 107). Köln: Institut der Deutschen Wirtschaft Köln Medien GmbH.
(2016).Diskussionspapiere
Marketing Authorization and Strategic Patenting: Evidence from Pharmaceuticals. DOI
(2024).- Patents are designed to incentivize innovation, but pharmaceutical firms often extend market exclusivity with secondary patents on marginally beneficial improvements. Such behaviors evoke discussions about raising patentability standards. This study examines whether pharmaceutical firms move away from filing strategic patents once the focal drug gains marketing authorization and the disclosed trial-related information becomes novelty-threatening prior art. We construct novel patent-drug dyadic data and leverage unique European drug patent and marketing contexts. Using an event study methodology, we exploit plausibly exogenous variation in the length of time from patent filing to drug approval. First, we illustrate that drugs with early and late marketing authorization share similar ex ante patent and drug characteristics. Second, we support the hypothesis that strategic patenting behavior decreases substantially after marketing authorization. In contrast, meaningful follow-on innovations remain unaffected. Third, we show that these effects are likely driven by obstacles in the enforceability of marginal patents filed after approval. We analyze heterogeneity across firm type, patent type, disease type, and enforceability. Our results suggest that post-marketing increases in patentability standards are welfare-enhancing with examiner scrutiny and firm self-adjustment. We highlight the importance of better data provision to patent examiners to increase the quality of follow-up inventions.
Market Size and Research: Evidence from the Pharmaceutical Industry, NBER Working Paper, No. w28858.
(2023).- Prior literature has established a link between changes in market size and pharmaceutical innovation; whether a link exists with scientific research remains an open question. If upstream research is not responsive to these changes, the kinds of scientific discoveries that flow into future drug development could be disconnected from downstream demand. We explore this question by exploiting the effects of quasi-experimental variation in market size introduced by Medicare Part D. We find no causal relationship between market size and biomedical research in the decade following the implementation of Medicare Part D. While many factors have been shown to motivate scientists to conduct research, this result suggests that changes in market size provide no such incentive. We do find, however, limited support for a response by corporate scientists conducting applied research. Implications for pharmaceutical innovation policy are discussed.
- Available at SSRN
- Also published as Max Planck Institute for Innovation & Competition Research Paper No. 21-16
Market Size and Research: Evidence from the Pharmaceutical Industry, Max Planck Institute for Innovation & Competition Research Paper, No. 21-16.
(2021).- Prior literature has established a link between changes in market size and pharmaceutical innovation; whether a link exists with scientific research remains an open question. If upstream research is not responsive to these changes, the kinds of scientific discoveries that flow into future drug development could be disconnected from downstream demand. We explore this question by exploiting the effects of quasi-experimental variation in market size introduced by Medicare Part D. We find no causal relationship between market size and biomedical research in the decade following the implementation of Medicare Part D. While many factors have been shown to motivate scientists to conduct research, this result suggests that changes in market size provide no such incentive. We do find, however, limited support for a response by corporate scientists conducting applied research. Implications for pharmaceutical innovation policy are discussed.
- Available at SSRN
- Also published as NBER Working Paper No. w28858
Vorträge
18.10.2021
Market Size and Research: Evidence from the Pharmaceutical Industry
DRUID Conference
Ort: Kopenhagen, Dänemark
10.09.2021
Market Size and Research: Evidence from the Pharmaceutical Industry
EPIP Conference
Ort: Madrid, Spanien
01.07.2021
Market Size and Research: Evidence from the Pharmaceutical Industry
BEWIP Seminar, TU München
Ort: München
21.12.2020
Fire and Mice: The Effect of Supply Shocks on Basic Science
Innovation Brown Bag Seminar, LMU
Ort: online
30.09.2020
Patents, Products, and Cumulative Innovation: Evidence From the Pharmaceutical Industry
Verein für Socialpolitik Jahrestagung, Universität zu Köln
Ort: online
10.09.2020
Market Size and Scientific Research: Evidence From Medicare Part D
Forschungsseminar
Ort: online
03.08.2020
Fire and Mice: The Effect of Supply Shocks on Basic Science
EPFL Virtual Innovation Seminar, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne
Ort: online
10.07.2020
Fire and Mice: The Effect of Supply Shocks on Basic Science
Workshop Organization, Economics and Policy of Scientific Research (WOEPSR), Max-Planck-Institut für Innovation und Wettbewerb
Ort: online
11.05.2020
Market Size and Scientific Research: Evidence From Medicare Part D
Innovation Brown Bag Seminar, LMU
Ort: online
06.03.2020
Patents, Products, and Cumulative Innovation: Evidence From the Pharmaceutical Industry
Mannheim Centre for Competition and Innovation (MaCCI), Annual Conference at the ZEW Mannheim
Ort: online
03.03.2020
Patents, Products, and Cumulative Innovation: Evidence From the Pharmaceutical Industry
Forschungsseminar
Ort: Zugspitze
22.01.2020
Fire and Mice: The Effect of Supply Shocks on Basic Science
TIME Seminar
Ort: München
16.12.2019
Fire and Mice: The Effect of Supply Shocks on Basic Science
2nd Research on Innovation, Science and Entrepreneurship Workshop (RISE2), Max-Planck-Institut für Innovation und Wettbewerb
Ort: München
11.12.2019
Drug Approval and Cumulative Innovation: Evidence From the Pharmaceutical Industry
Research Seminar at the Laboratory for Innovation Science at Harvard/Harvard University
Ort: Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
14.11.2019
Drug Approval and Cumulative Innovation: Evidence From the Pharmaceutical Industry
Ph.D. Seminar at the David Eccles School of Business/University of Utah
Ort: Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
04.11.2019
Fire and Mice: The Effect of Supply Shocks on Basic Science
Department Meeting at the Laboratory for Innovation Science at Harvard/Harvard University
Ort: Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
13.09.2019
Patent Terms, Marketing Authorization and Cumulative Innovation: Evidence From the Pharmaceutical Industry
European Policy for Intellectual Property (EPIP)
Ort: Zürich, Schweiz
05.09.2019
Patent Terms, Marketing Authorization and Cumulative Innovation: Evidence From the Pharmaceutical Industry
Doktorandenseminar, Max-Planck-Institut für Innovation und Wettbewerb
Ort: Tutzing
24.06.2019
Fire and Mice: The Effect of Supply Shocks on Basic Science
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Ort: München
05.03.2019
Fire and Mice: The Effect of Supply Shocks on Basic Science
Doktorandenseminar, Max-Planck-Institut für Innovation und Wettbewerb
Ort: Zugspitze