Dr. Dennis Byrski
Former Research Fellow
Innovation and Entrepreneurship Research
Areas of Interest:
Economics of Innovation, Economics of Science, Empirical Industrial Organization, Health Economics
Academic Résumé
10/2016 - 10/2021
Research Fellow and Doctoral Candidate at the Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition (Innovation and Entrepreneurship Research) and at the Munich Graduate School of Economics, LMU Munich, Germany
Doctoral Thesis: “From Scientific Research to Healthcare Markets – Empirical Essays on the Economics of Pharmaceutical Innovation”
09/2019 - 12/2019
Visiting Research Fellow at the Laboratory for Innovation Science at Harvard (LISH), Harvard Business School
10/2013 - 02/2016
Master of Science (M.Sc.) in Economics at the University of Cologne
and the Tsinghua University (Beijing, China)
10/2012 - 09/2013
Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Economics at the Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
10/2009 - 09/2012
Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Business Administration at the Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
and the Grenoble Graduate School of Business (Grenoble, France)
Work Experience
07/2016 - 09/2016
Intern, Frontier Economics, Cologne
04/2016 - 06/2016
Intern, German Federal Cartel Office (Department for Econometrics), Bonn
02/2016 - 04/2016
Intern, Accenture Strategy, Berlin
03/2015 - 02/2016
Research Assistant at the Institute for Economic Research (IW Köln)
in the field of “Collective Bargaining and Industrial Relations”, Cologne
02/2013 - 08/2014
Student Assistant, Verlagsgruppe Handelsblatt, Düsseldorf
04/2012 - 07/2012 and 04/2011 - 07/2011
Teaching Assistant, Chair of Taxation (Prof. Dr. Guido Förster) at the Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf
02/2012 - 04/2012
Intern, KPMG AG, Düsseldorf
Fellowships and Grants
Since 05/2018
Science Production Function Society Fellow at the Laboratory for Innovation Science at Harvard (LISH), Harvard Business School
2012 - 2016
Scholarship by the Friedrich Naumann Foundation for Freedom, merit-based fellowship program funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)
2009 - 2011
NRW-Scholarship “Chancen Nutzen”, merit-based scholarship funded by the Ministry of Innovation, Higher Education and Research of the German State of North Rhine-Westphalia
Publications
Articles in Refereed Journals
Fire and Mice: The Effect of Supply Shocks on Basic Science, Academy of Management Proceedings, 2020 (1). DOI
(2020).- We study how a negative supply shock to research-related assets affects the production of scientific knowledge. In particular, we exploit the 1989 Morrell Park fire that destroyed a considerable share of the world's largest mice breeding facility, the Jackson Laboratory, and killed approximately 400,000 mice. This fire led to an unforeseen and substantial supply shortage in mice for the North American biomedical research community, which we can isolate at the strain and scientist level based on proprietary archival data. Using difference-in-differences estimations, we find that the scientific productivity of affected scientists decreases when measured in simple publication counts, but much less so when we adjust for the publications' quality. Moreover, affected researchers are more likely to initiate research that is unrelated to their previous work. This indicates that affected scientists switched research trajectories but maintained their scientific impact. In the aggregate, the temporary supply shortage of particular mice strains led to a permanent decrease in their usage among U.S.\ scientists. These results highlight the important role of supply chains in basic science."
IP-Based Incentives Against Antimicrobial Crisis: A European Perspective, IIC - international review of intellectual property and competition law, 50 (1), 30-76. DOI
(2019).- The field of antimicrobials is considered to be facing a crisis. Increasing
microbial resistance is creating a demand for new drugs, which however is not being
matched by privately funded R&D. The reasons for this market failure are of a
technical and economic nature. The present article analyzes what changes to IP-
based incentives are conceivable in the European Union (EU) in order to address the
antimicrobial crisis. Since the assessment of the suitability of the analyzed options
depends on interdisciplinary research, this article also proposes a research agenda to
be considered for the implementation of public policies in this field.
Edited Books, Collected Editions
Study on the legal aspects of Supplementary Protection Certificates in the EU. Final report. Brussel: European Commission. DOI
(2018).Contributions to Collected Editions
Section 16.2 - Duration of the SPC (Art. 13 Reg. 469/2009) - Effective length of SPC protection, in: Roberto Romandini, Reto M. Hilty, Annette Kur (
Chapter 16 - Duration of the SPC (Art. 13 Reg. 469/2009), in: Roberto Romandini, Reto M. Hilty, Annette Kur (
Annex V - SPC Statistics to Chapter 7, in: Roberto Romandini, Reto M. Hilty, Annette Kur (
Chapter 7 - Overall Use of the SPC System in the EU, in: Roberto Romandini, Reto M. Hilty, Annette Kur (
Monographies
From Scientific Research to Healthcare Markets: Empirical Essays on the Economics of Pharmaceutical Innovation. DOI
(2021).- This dissertation offers new insights into the determinants of biomedical science and pharmaceutical innovation, each in a self-contained chapter. The first chapter investigates the functioning of research tool markets, which are important input factors into science. Specifically, it observes why short-term distortions to supply have enduring effects on tool adoption and, thus, the direction of scientific research. The second chapter examines whether pharmaceutical companies adjust their follow-on innovation activities when patentability standards increase. To this end, it analyses changes in the innovation incentives caused by a drug’s marketing authorization. The third chapter explores the relationship between downstream shifts in demand and upstream research. It studies whether a policy-induced increase in market size affects scientific publishing by universities and corporations. In summary, evidence from these micro-economic analyses may contribute to designing effective and efficient public policies that help stimulate R&D activities, foster the development of new pharmaceutical treatments, and eventually improve public health.
Flächentarifvertrag und Tarifpartnerschaft in Deutschland: Ein historischer Rückblick (IW-Analysen, 107). Köln: Institut der Deutschen Wirtschaft Köln Medien GmbH.
(2016).Discussion Papers
Marketing Authorization and Strategic Patenting: Evidence from Pharmaceuticals. DOI
(2024).- Patents are designed to incentivize innovation, but pharmaceutical firms often extend market exclusivity with secondary patents on marginally beneficial improvements. Such behaviors evoke discussions about raising patentability standards. This study examines whether pharmaceutical firms move away from filing strategic patents once the focal drug gains marketing authorization and the disclosed trial-related information becomes novelty-threatening prior art. We construct novel patent-drug dyadic data and leverage unique European drug patent and marketing contexts. Using an event study methodology, we exploit plausibly exogenous variation in the length of time from patent filing to drug approval. First, we illustrate that drugs with early and late marketing authorization share similar ex ante patent and drug characteristics. Second, we support the hypothesis that strategic patenting behavior decreases substantially after marketing authorization. In contrast, meaningful follow-on innovations remain unaffected. Third, we show that these effects are likely driven by obstacles in the enforceability of marginal patents filed after approval. We analyze heterogeneity across firm type, patent type, disease type, and enforceability. Our results suggest that post-marketing increases in patentability standards are welfare-enhancing with examiner scrutiny and firm self-adjustment. We highlight the importance of better data provision to patent examiners to increase the quality of follow-up inventions.
Market Size and Research: Evidence from the Pharmaceutical Industry, NBER Working Paper, No. w28858.
(2023).- Prior literature has established a link between changes in market size and pharmaceutical innovation; whether a link exists with scientific research remains an open question. If upstream research is not responsive to these changes, the kinds of scientific discoveries that flow into future drug development could be disconnected from downstream demand. We explore this question by exploiting the effects of quasi-experimental variation in market size introduced by Medicare Part D. We find no causal relationship between market size and biomedical research in the decade following the implementation of Medicare Part D. While many factors have been shown to motivate scientists to conduct research, this result suggests that changes in market size provide no such incentive. We do find, however, limited support for a response by corporate scientists conducting applied research. Implications for pharmaceutical innovation policy are discussed.
- Available at SSRN
- Also published as Max Planck Institute for Innovation & Competition Research Paper No. 21-16
Market Size and Research: Evidence from the Pharmaceutical Industry, Max Planck Institute for Innovation & Competition Research Paper, No. 21-16.
(2021).- Prior literature has established a link between changes in market size and pharmaceutical innovation; whether a link exists with scientific research remains an open question. If upstream research is not responsive to these changes, the kinds of scientific discoveries that flow into future drug development could be disconnected from downstream demand. We explore this question by exploiting the effects of quasi-experimental variation in market size introduced by Medicare Part D. We find no causal relationship between market size and biomedical research in the decade following the implementation of Medicare Part D. While many factors have been shown to motivate scientists to conduct research, this result suggests that changes in market size provide no such incentive. We do find, however, limited support for a response by corporate scientists conducting applied research. Implications for pharmaceutical innovation policy are discussed.
- Available at SSRN
- Also published as NBER Working Paper No. w28858
Lectures and Talks
18.10.2021
Market Size and Research: Evidence from the Pharmaceutical Industry
DRUID Conference
Location: Copenhagen, Danmark
10.09.2021
Market Size and Research: Evidence from the Pharmaceutical Industry
EPIP Conference
Location: Madrid, Spain
01.07.2021
Market Size and Research: Evidence from the Pharmaceutical Industry
BEWIP Seminar, TUM
Loaction: Munich
21.12.2020
Fire and Mice: The Effect of Supply Shocks on Basic Science
Innovation Brown Bag Seminar, LMU
Location: online
30.09.2020
Patents, Products, and Cumulative Innovation: Evidence From the Pharmaceutical Industry
Verein für Socialpolitik Jahrestagung, University of Cologne
Location: online
10.09.2020
Market Size and Scientific Research: Evidence from Medicare Part D
Research Seminar
Location: online
03.08.2020
Fire and Mice: The Effect of Supply Shocks on Basic Science
EPFL Virtual Innovation Seminar, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne
Location: online
10.07.2020
Fire and Mice: The Effect of Supply Shocks on Basic Science
Workshop Organization, Economics and Policy of Scientific Research (WOEPSR), Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition
Location: online
11.05.2020
Market Size and Scientific Research: Evidence From Medicare Part D
Innovation Brown Bag Seminar, LMU
Location: online
06.03.2020
Patents, Products, and Cumulative Innovation: Evidence From the Pharmaceutical Industry
Mannheim Centre for Competition and Innovation (MaCCI), Annual Conference at the ZEW Mannheim
Location: online
03.03.2020
Patents, Products, and Cumulative Innovation: Evidence From the Pharmaceutical Industry
Research Seminar
Location: Zugspitze
22.01.2020
Fire and Mice: The Effect of Supply Shocks on Basic Science
TIME Seminar
Location: Munich
16.12.2019
Fire and Mice: The Effect of Supply Shocks on Basic Science
2nd Research on Innovation, Science and Entrepreneurship Workshop (RISE2), Max-Planck-Institut für Innovation und Wettbewerb
Location: Munich
11.12.2019
Drug Approval and Cumulative Innovation: Evidence From the Pharmaceutical Industry
Research Seminar at the Laboratory for Innovation Science at Harvard/Harvard University
Location: Cambridge, Massachusetts, US
14.11.2019
Drug Approval and Cumulative Innovation: Evidence From the Pharmaceutical Industry
Ph.D. Seminar at the David Eccles School of Business/University of Utah
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah, US
04.11.2019
Fire and Mice: The Effect of Supply Shocks on Basic Science
Department Meeting at the Laboratory for Innovation Science at Harvard/Harvard University
Location: Cambridge, Massachusetts, US
13.09.2019
Patent Terms, Marketing Authorization and Cumulative Innovation: Evidence From the Pharmaceutical Industry
European Policy for Intellectual Property (EPIP)
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
05.09.2019
Patent Terms, Marketing Authorization and Cumulative Innovation: Evidence From the Pharmaceutical Industry
Doctoral Seminar, Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition
Location: Tutzing
24.06.2019
Fire and Mice: The Effect of Supply Shocks on Basic Science
LMU Munich
Location: Munich
05.03.2019
Fire and Mice: The Effect of Supply Shocks on Basic Science
Doctoral Seminar, Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition
Location: Zugspitze