Carolina Banda
Doktorandin und wissenschaftliche Mitarbeiterin
Immaterialgüter- und Wettbewerbsrecht
carolina.banda(at)ip.mpg.de
Arbeitsbereiche:
Rechtliche Implikationen der datengetriebenen Wirtschaft, Datenschutzrecht, Kartellrecht, Digitale Gesundheit, Informationstechnologierecht und Innovation.
Wissenschaftlicher Werdegang
Seit 2018
Doktorandin und wissenschafltiche Mitarbeiterin am Max-Planck-Institut für Innovation und Wettbewerb
Doktorvater: Prof. Dr. Josef Drexl LL.M. (Berkeley)
2016 - 2017
Munich Intellectual Property Law Center (MIPLC) in München
Master of Laws im gewerblichen Rechtsschutz und Wettbewerbsrecht
2010 - 2014
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador
Rechtsanwältin
Berufserfahrung
2017
Praktikantin, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer
München, Deutschland (IP / IT-Recht)
2015 - 2016
Juristin, Ecuadorianisches Justizministerium
Quito, Ecuador
2014 - 2015
Juristin, Superintendencia de Control de Poder del Mercado (Ecuadorianische Kartellbehörde)
Quito, Ecuador (Fusionen & Übernahmen)
2014
Praktikantin, Ecuadorianisches Außenministerium
Quito, Ecuador (Internationales Recht)
Workshop-Organisation
Dezember 2022
Data Sharing & Climate Action in Brazil
Mackenzie University, Sao Paulo (gemeinsam mit Germán Johannsen)
Ehrungen und wissenschaftliche Preise
2018
Max-Planck-Institut für Innovation und Wettbewerb, Promotionsstipendium
2016 – 2017
MIPLC Alumni Stipendium
2016 – 2017
Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst (DAAD), Stipendium für den Master in Immaterialgüter- und Wettbewerbsrecht (LL.M.)
2014
SENESCYT - Stipendium der Ecuadorianischen Regierung, bewilligt von der Kartellbehörde und dem Nationalen Sekretariat für Hochschulbildung, Wissenschaft und Technologie, zur Finanzierung aller Kosten der Bachelor-Abschlussarbeit
Mitgliedschaften
Ecuadorianische Anwaltskammer (Foro de Abogados del Ecuador)
DAAD Alumni (Link)
Publikationen
Forschungspapiere
Enforcing Data Portability in the Context of EU Competition Law and the GDPR, MIPLC Master Thesis Series (2016/17) 2018, 67
- When the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) comes into force in May 2018, one of its most controversial features will be the Right to Data Portability (RDP) introduced in Article 20. The RDP empowers individuals not only to obtain a copy of their information but also to transfer that data from one undertaking to another. Thus, the RDP contains two elements: consumer empowerment through data autonomy and increased data mobility which enhances competition. However, it remains unclear to what extent the RDP may actually help to resolve issues pertaining to lock-in effects in data-driven markets characterised by strong networks effects, barriers to entry and switching costs. This thesis analyses the characteristics of the RDP in comparison with the legal framework of the EU competition law. It presents several scenarios where the pro-competitive characteristics of the RDP may be helpful for competition matters. By contrast, this research also analyses the limitations of the RDP concerning several issues such as technical feasibility and interoperability. Consequently, we suggest that the RDP should be applied carefully, only in certain cases and sectors where the risk of abuse of dominance and entry barriers are high. Otherwise, the RDP may have an adverse effect for users, businesses and innovation.
- Available at SSRN
Stellungnahmen
Position Statement of the Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition of 25 May 2022 on the Commission's Proposal of 23 February 2022 for a Regulation on Harmonised Rules on Fair Access to and Use of Data (Data Act), 2022, 124
- On 23 February 2022, the European Commission issued a Proposal for a Regulation on harmonised rules on fair access to and use of data (Data Act). The overarching objective of the Proposal is to ‘ensure fairness in the digital environment, stimulate a competitive data market, open opportunities for data-driven innovation and make data available for all’. The Institute hereby presents its Position Statement that features a comprehensive analysis of whether and to what extent the proposed rules might reach the envisaged objectives. It comments on all parts of the Proposal, including the new IoT data access and use right. Finally, the Institute offers a set of recommendations as to how the proposed provisions should be amended in the legislative process to align them better with the objectives of the Data Act.
- Position_Statement_MPI_Data_Act_Formal__13.06.2022.pdf
- Also published as: Max Planck Institute for Innovation & Competition Research Paper No. 22-05
Andere Veröffentlichungen, Presseartikel, Interviews
A Closer Insight into Copyright Related Issues in the Position Statement of the Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition on the Commission’s Proposal for a Data Act, Kluwer Copyright Blog 2022 (
Lehrveranstaltungen
Sommer 2024
Dozentin für „Digital Health Regulation“ im Rahmen des LL.M.-Studiengangs für Intellectual Property and Competition Law
Munich Intellectual Property Law Center (MIPLC)
2017 – 2021
Tutorin der Basismodule (Urheberrecht, Markenrecht, Patentrecht) und bestimmter Wahlfächer
Munich Intellectual Property Law Center (MIPLC)