Veranstaltungen

Max-Planck-Institut für Innovation und Wettbewerb, München, Raum 313

Advances in science and innovation are traditionally viewed as starting from a question or problem or challenge. We have a problem to solve, a question to answer, and we seek ways to address these. However, anecdotal evidence suggests that some of the most creative and revolutionary solutions and innovations arise by a different process, where solutions did not come by seeking to address a problem. For example, Velcro was invented by de Mestral following an experience with a plant burr that stuck to his clothing. Seeing the mechanism by which the burr clung to fabric suggested a new way to design fasteners. Both the need and the solution were novel to him at the time of his observation and insight. Recent work by von Hippel and von Krogh (2016) has argued that such discoveries may arise from a heretofore unstudied form of solution-finding. They proposed that such discoveries arise without the need for a priori problem-formulation. Instead, a chance observation or encounter prompts an insight that provides a solution which by its recognition identifies the need it satisfies simultaneously. They termed this kind of situation “a need-solution pair.” It will be argued that need-solution pair innovation may be a highly prevalent and creative form of solution-finding that emerges from the natural capacity of perceivers to apprehend (consciously or unconsciously) the functions of objects as part of the natural process of object recognition and understanding. Implications of this unstudied process for models of general solution-finding will be discussed and direction for further research and improved approaches to innovation be offered.

Ansprechpartnerin: Fabian Gaessler

Moderation: Francisco Beneke

Max-Planck-Institut für Innovation und Wettbewerb, Raum 313

While data interoperability solutions will certainly consist on a combination of these three paths, the intended workshop focuses primarily on the role that both data standards and APIs play in achieving IoT data interoperability. By exchanging views with business, data and standardization experts in the IoT field, the workshop should provide us with the necessary technical and market knowledge to assess the economic, legal and regulatory implications of data standardization and the emerging “API economy”.

Each workshop will address the different kinds of standards which in the Institute’s view are relevant for the IoT. The focus of the second workshop will be the IoT data interoperability.

The workshop will be held at the Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition. Participation is by invitation only.

See Program

Max-Planck-Institut für Innovation und Wettbewerb, München, Raum 313

We provide a practitioner's view on the economics of licensing standard-essential patents and related issues of standard development. Based on a presentation of the paper "Over-Declaration of Standard Essential Patents and Determinants of Essentiality", recent industry developments, contrast practical experiences, and the economic literature will be discussed, and potential topics for future research will be raised. Timo Ali-Vehmas, Nokia head of ecosystems research and former VP, compatibility and industry collaboration, will join for the presentation.

An diesem Tag können Besucherinnen und Besucher den Forschenden Fragen stellen, sich erklären lassen, was Patent-, Marken-, Urheber- und Kartellrecht bzw. Innovation und Entrepreneurship ist, Forschung live im Labor erleben, die eindrucksvolle Architektur des Hauses auf sich wirken lassen oder die einzigartige Bibliothek besichtigen.

Link zum Programm

Moderation: Daria Kim

Max-Planck-Institut für Innovation und Wettbewerb, Raum 313

Max-Planck-Institut für Innovation und Wettbewerb, München, Raum 313

Family background matters for entrepreneurship; however, the focus on factors making siblings similar rather than different may hide important sources of heterogeneity and understate the total importance of families. In a set of causal exercises using Swedish register data, I assess the differential effects of birth order, family size, and sibling sex composition on entrepreneurship. These factors appear to have a negligible impact. While later born men are more likely to become unincorporated entrepreneurs, this effect is largely explained by their lower education, pointing towards the subsistence nature of this type of entrepreneurship. I find no evidence of causal family size effects in linear and non-linear instrumental variable approaches, although there is a small negative effect of having a brother on the father-daughter association in unincorporated entrepreneurship. Finally, neither source of within-family heterogeneity exhibits a clear relationship with incorporated entrepreneurship. The results are consistent with the absence of adult sibling peer effects in entrepreneurship and confirm the role of families in generating sibling similarities, not differences. The importance of family background for entrepreneurship is therefore only marginally understated, and accounting for within-family differences increases previously estimated sibling correlations by little.

Ansprechpartnerin: Laura Rosendahl Huber, Ph.D.

Max-Planck-Institut für Innovation und Wettbewerb, München, Raum E10

In its 2017 Lilly v Actavis decision, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom decided to alter the way in which questions of patent claim construction and infringement are dealt with under UK law. A doctrine of equivalents is back again in England. In this seminar Mr Justice Birss will seek to explain the implications of this decision and what may be some of the difficulties which the courts will have to grapple with as a result. A fundamental question relates to the interaction between validity and this new approach. Or to pose the question another way: is Lilly v Actavis a decision about claim scope in general or infringement in particular?

Dr. Klaus Bacher, Richter am Bundesgerichtshof, wird im Anschluss die Grundgedanken der Äquivalenzlehre in Deutschland aufzeigen und auf die Entwicklung der Rechtsprechung hierzulande eingehen.

Zur Erleichterung unserer Vorbereitungen bitten wir um Anmeldung bis Freitag, den 7. September 2018 per E-Mail an elisabeth.amler(at)ip.mpg.de

Am Freitag, den 20. Juli 2018, findet am Max-Planck-Institut für Innovation und Wettbewerb das 6. Crowdinvesting Symposium statt. Die jährliche Veranstaltung wurde von Prof. Dr. Lars Klöhn, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, und Prof. Dr. Lars Hornuf, Universität Bremen, initiiert und erstmals im Februar 2013 an der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München ausgerichtet.

Lars Hornuf ist seit April 2016 im Rahmen des DFG-geförderten Forschungsprojekts "Crowdinvesting in Deutschland, England und den USA: Regulierungsperspektiven und Wohlfahrtseffekte einer neuen Finanzierungsform" Affiliated Research Fellow am Max-Planck-Institut für Innovation und Wettbewerb.

Das Crowdinvesting Symposium bietet Akademikern und Praktikern eine Plattform, sich über die neuesten Entwicklungen im diesem Bereich auszutauschen sowie sich untereinander zu vernetzen. Darüber hinaus wurde ein Forum geschaffen, welches den europäischen sowie die nationalen Gesetzgeber bei zukünftigen Gesetzesvorhaben und Gesetzesreformvorhaben auf wissenschaftlicher Basis informiert. Dafür wird jährlich ein Schwerpunkt definiert, der aus wirtschaftswissenschaftlicher und juristischer Perspektive aktuelle Fragen des Crowdinvesting untersucht. Die Erkenntnisse aus den Symposien werden in den relevanten hochrangigen Fachzeitschriften publiziert.

Zum Programm

Max-Planck-Institut für Innovation und Wettbewerb, München, Raum 313

Abstract:
The digitization of economic activity has important socio-economic development implications and at the same time creates challenges for antitrust analysis. These implications and challenges have been met differently in jurisdictions around the world.  We analyze the different experiences in the EU and developing countries, focusing on mobile payments. We find that this market exhibits special characteristics that need to be taken into account in the analysis of competition conditions. First, it is enabled by mobile telecommunications infrastructure and is offered by network operators, which causes competition in both markets to be closely linked. Second, there is still regulatory arbitrage which potentially favors mobile payments. Third, there are factors, such as the lack of interoperability and geographical reach, that make network effects in this industry different from those present in other platforms. Fourth, since mobile payments in developing countries serve a niche—the population underserved by mainstream banking—the definition of the relevant market is not straightforward. We propose the criteria to be applied when making such definition. Finally, since mobile payments have associated financial services, there is an interaction between competition and financial stability that needs to be considered.

Hinweis: Dieses Seminar besitzt einen interdisziplinären Charakter und folgt einem neuartigem Format: Nach einem 30-minütigen Einführungsvortrag von Jörg und Paco werden wir uns während der Diskussion auf die ökonomischen Aspekte des Projekts konzentrieren.

Ansprechpartnerin: Zhaoxin Pu