Prof. Dr. Lars Hornuf
Former Research Fellow
Innovation and Entrepreneurship Research
Professor of Business Administration, esp. Financial Services and Financial Technology, University of Bremen
Areas of Interest:
Finance Technology, Behavioral Economics, Data Protection, Economic Analysis of Law
Academic Résumé
2019
Offer for a Full Professorship for Finance, Skema Business School Paris
2019
Habilitation at the Faculty of Economics, University of Regensburg (Venia Legendi Business Administration)
2018
Certified Derivatives Trader (Eurex)
2018
Visiting Professor at the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University
Since 2017
Professor of Business Administration, especially Financial Services and Financial Technology, University of Bremen
Since 2017
Affiliate Member, CESifo Research Network
Since 2017
Research Fellow, Center of Finance, University of Regensburg
2017 - 2018
Visiting Professor, Graduate School of Management and Law
2016
Visiting Research Fellow, Center for Economic Studies, University of Munich
2016 - 2017
Visiting Research Fellow, Georgetown Law, Georgetown University
2016 - 2021
Affiliated Research Fellow, Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition (Innovation and Entrepreneurship Research)
2015
Visiting Professor, Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition (Innovation and Entrepreneurship Research)
2015
Offer for an Assistant Professorship (W1) for Innovation with Focus on Digital Innovation in the Service Industry at European Business School / Strascheg Institute for Entrepreneurship and Innovation (declined)
2014 - 2017
Assistant Professor of Law and Economics, Department of Economics, University of Trier
2014
Visiting Fellow, Social Science Research Institute, Duke University
2014
Visiting Professor, Faculté de Finance, Banque, Comptabilité, Université Lille 2
2013
Postdoctoral Researcher, Faculty of Law, University of Munich
2012 - 2013
Visiting Professor, House of Finance, Goethe-University Frankfurt
2012
Visiting Scholar, Stanford Law School, Stanford University
2011
PhD in Economics, University of Munich
2010
Visiting Researcher, Boalt Hall School of Law, UC Berkeley
2008 - 2012
Research Associate, Faculty of Law, University of Munich
2006 - 2008
Junior Researcher and Ph.D. Student, Ifo Institute for Economic Research
2005
Intern, DB Research, Deutsche Bank
2005
MA in Political Economy, University of Essex
2001 - 2003
Undergraduate Studies in Political Science, Business Administration and History, University of Freiburg
Memberships
American Economic Association
German Finance Association (DGF)
Verein für Socialpolitik (VfS)
Memberships in Editorial Boards
Advanced Studies in Diginomics and Digitalization
Associate Editor “FinTech” Track European Conference on Information Systems 2017
Studies of European Economic Law and Regulation
Legal Expertises
Research Grant Institutions
German Council of Science and Humanities (WR)
German Research Foundation (DFG)
Belgian Fund for Scientific Research (F.R.S. – FNRS)
UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) / Future Leaders Fellowship Scheme
Luxembourg National Research Fund (FNR)
Swiss National Science Foundation
The German Israeli Foundation for Scientific Research and Development (GIF)
Journals
British Journal of Management
Business Research
California Management Review
Corporate Governance: An International Review
Economics Bulletin
Electronic Markets
Energy Economics
Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice
Eurasian Business Review
European Business Organization Law Review
European Journal of Finance
European Journal of Law and Economics
European Journal of Political Economy
Financial Research Letters
International Journal of Information Management
Journal of Banking and Finance
Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics
Journal of Business Venturing
Journal of Corporate Finance
Journal of Economic Surveys
Journal of Economics & Management Strategy
Journal of Institutional Economics
Journal of Political Economy
Journal of Small Business Management
Neurocomputing
Pacific-Basin Finance Journal
Small Business Economics
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Telematics and Informatics
Venture Capital - An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance
Conferences
International Conference on Information Systems 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018
Jahrestagung des Vereins für Socialpolitik 2021
Interdisziplinäre Jahreskonferenz zu Entrepreneurship, Innovation und Mittelstand (G-Forum) 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016, 2015
Associate Editor Pre-ICIS Workshop Changing Nature of Work (CNoW) 2019
"FinTech" Track European Conference on Information Systems 2018, 2017
2nd Abbé Grégoire Innovation Day
Publications
Articles in Refereed Journals
The Relevance of Investor Rights in Equity Crowdfunding, Journal of Corporate Finance 77. DOI
(2022).Initial Coin Offerings Information Disclosure and Fraud, Small Business Economics, 58 (4), 1741-1759. DOI
(2021).Protecting Investors in Equity Crowdfunding: An Empirical Analysis of the Small Investor Protection Act, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 162. DOI
(2021).- During the past decade, equity crowdfunding (ECF) has emerged as an alternative funding channel for startup firms. In Germany, the Small Investor Protection Act became binding in July 2015, with the legislative goal to protect investors engaging in this new asset class. Since then, investors pledging more than 1,000 EUR now must self-report their income and wealth. Investing more than 10,000 EUR in a single ECF issuer is only possible through a corporate entity. We examine how the Small Investor Protection Act has affected investor behavior at Companisto, Germany's largest ECF portal for startup firms. The results show that after the new law became binding, sophisticated investors invest less on average while casual investors invest more. Moreover, the signaling capacity of large investments has disappeared.
How Do Banks Interact with Fintechs?, Small Business Economics, 57 (3), 1505-1526. DOI
(2020).- The increasing pervasiveness of technology-driven firms that offer financial services has led to growing pressure on traditional banks to modernize their core business activities and services. Many banks tackle the challenges of digitalization by cooperating with startup firms that offer technology-driven financial services and novel service packages (fintechs). In this article, we examine which banks typically collaborate with fintechs, how intensely they do so, and which form of alliance they prefer. Using hand-collected data covering the largest banks from Canada, France, Germany, and the United Kingdom, we provide detailed evidence on the different forms of alliances occurring in practice. We show that banks are significantly more likely to form alliances with fintechs when they pursue a well-defined digital strategy and/or employ a chief digital officer. Moreover, in line with incomplete contract theory, we find that banks more frequently invest in small fintechs but often build product-related collaborations with larger fintechs.
- Also published as: CESifo Working Paper No. 7170
Where Did Fintechs Come From, and Where Do They Go? The Transformation of the Financial Industry in Germany After Digitalization, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence in Finance), 3. DOI
(2020).- The digitalization of financial services opened a window for new players in the financial industry. These start-ups take on tasks and functions previously reserved for banks, such as lending, payments, or investment. In this article, we trace the transformation of the industry after digitalization. By using data on FinTech formations in Germany, we provide first evidence that entrepreneurial dynamics in the FinTech sector are not so much driven by technology as by the educational and business background of the founders. Furthermore, we investigate the reactions of traditional banks to the emergence of these start-ups. In contrast with other emerging industries such as biotechnology, a network analysis shows that FinTechs have mostly engaged in strategic partnerships and only a few banks have acquired or obtained a financial interest in a FinTech. We explain the restraint of traditional banks to fully endorse the new possibilities of digitalized financial services with the characteristics of the technology itself and with the postponed fundamental decisions of banks to modernize their IT infrastructure.
- Also published at SSRN
The Entrepreneurial Finance Markets of the Future: A Comparison of Crowdfunding and Initial Coin Offerings, Small Business Economics, 57 (2), 865-882. DOI
(2020).- Entrepreneurial finance markets are in a dynamic state. New market niches and players have developed and continue to emerge. The rules of the game and the methods for receiving financial backing have changed in many ways. This editorial and the special issue of Small Business Economics focus on crowdfunding (CF) and initial coin offerings (ICOs), which are two distinct but important entrepreneurial finance market segments of the future. Although the two market segments initially appear to be similar, we identify differences between them. Our comparison focuses on the stakeholders, microstructures, regulatory environments, and development of the markets. We conclude with suggestions for future ICO and CF research.
Der deutsche FinTech-Markt im Jahr 2020, Ifo Schnelldienst, 2020 (8), 33-40.
(2020).- Die FinTech-Branche ist ein dynamisch wachsender Markt, auf dem sich beständig neue Geschäftsmodelle und Segmente herausbilden. Mit den neuen Akteuren sind erhebliche Möglichkeiten, aber auch signifikante Risiken für den Finanzmarkt verbunden, weshalb eine regelmäßige Untersuchung der Marktgrößen von Bedeutung ist. Vor vier Jahren wurden im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums der Finanzen erstmals Daten zu den Marktvolumina deutscher FinTech-Unternehmen für den Zeitraum von 2007 bis 2015 erhoben und eine Prognose für die zukünftige Marktentwicklung erstellt. Im vorliegenden Aufsatz werden die Marktvolumina bis zum Jahr 2019 fortgeschrieben und die ursprünglichen Prognosen auf ihren Vorhersagegehalt überprüft. Gegenüber den ursprünglichen Prognosen haben einzelne Teilsegmente die Prognose des realistischen Szenarios deutlich übertroffen (Crowdlending, Robo-Advice, Anlage und Banking), während andere Teilsegmente bislang hinter den Erwartungen zurückblieben (spenden- und gegenleistungsbasiertes Crowdfunding, Crowdinvesting, Factoring).
- https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/sd-2020-08-dorfleitner-hornuf-wannenmacher-deutscher-fin-tech-markt.pdf
Die Befreiungsvorschriften des Kleinanlegerschutzgesetzes: Eine Follow-up-Studie, Ifo-Schnelldienst, 72 (9), 26-37.
(2019).The Economic Impact of Forming a European Company, Journal of Common Market Studies, 57 (4), 659-674. DOI
(2019).Exemption Provisions of the German Small Investor Protection Act: A Follow-up Study, CESifo DICE Report, 17 (2), 41-51.
(2019).Do Judges Hate Speculators?, European Journal of Law and Economics, 47 (2), 147-169. DOI
(2019).- Historically, people have often expressed negative feelings toward speculators, a
sentiment that might have even been reinforced since the latest financial crisis, dur-
ing which taxpayer money was warranted or spent to bail out reckless investors. In
this paper, we conjecture that judges may also have anti-speculator sentiment, which
might affect their professional decision making. We asked 123 professional law-
yers and 247 law students in Germany this question, and they clearly predicted that
judges would have an anti-speculator bias. However, in an actual behavioral study,
185 judges did not exhibit such bias. In another sample of 170 professional lawyers,
we found weak support for an anti-speculator bias. This evidence suggests that an
independent audience may actually perceive unbiased judgments as biased. While
the literature usually suggests that a communication problem exists between lawyers
and non-lawyers (i.e. between judges and the general public), we find that this prob-
lem can also exist within the legal community. - Also published in: The Romanian Judges' Forum Review, 1/2019, 26 - 45
Libra: Eine Währung, die die Welt (nicht) braucht? - Bigtechs und digitale Zahlungssysteme, Ifo-Schnelldienst, 72 (17), 9-12.
(2019).The Emergence of the Global Fintech Market: Economic and Technological Determinants, Small Business Economics, 53 (1), 81-105. DOI
(2019).- We investigate the economic and technological determinants inducing entrepreneurs to establish ventures with the purpose of reinventing financial technology (fintech). We find that countries witness more fintech startup formations when the latest technology is readily available, capital markets are well-developed, and people have more mobile telephone subscriptions. Furthermore, the available labor force has a positive impact on the development of this new market segment. Finally, the more sound the financial system, the lower the number of fintech startups in a country. Overall, the evidence suggests that fintech startup formation need not be left to chance, but active policies can influence the emergence of this new sector.
Do Judges Hate Speculators?, The Romanian Judges' Forum Review, 1/2019, 26-45.
(2019).The Impact of Two Different Economic Systems on Dishonesty, European Journal of Political Economy, 59 (C), 179-195. DOI
(2019).- Using an artefactual field experiment, this paper tests the long-term implications of living in a specific economic system on individual dishonesty. By comparing cheating behaviour across individuals from the former socialist East of Germany with those of the capitalist West of Germany, we examine behavioural differences within a single country. We find long-term implications of living in a specific economic system for individual dishonesty when social interactions are possible: participants with an East German background cheated significantly more on an abstract die-rolling task than those with a West German background, but only when exposed to the enduring system of former West Germany. Moreover, our results indicate that the longer individuals had experienced socialist East Germany, the more likely they were to cheat on the behavioural task.
Equity Crowdfunding in Germany and the UK: Follow-up Funding and Firm Failure, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 26 (5), 331-354. DOI
(2018).- Today, startups often obtain financing via the Internet through many small contributions of non-sophisticated investors. Yet little is known about whether these startups can ultimately
build enduring businesses. In this article, we hand-collected data from 14 different equity
crowdfunding (ECF) portals and 426 firms that ran at least one successful ECF campaign in
Germany or the United Kingdom. We empirically analyze different factors affecting
follow-up funding and firm failure. The findings show that German firms that received ECF
stood a higher chance of obtaining follow-up funding through business angels or venture
capitalists, but also had a higher likelihood of failure. The number of senior managers,
subsequent successful ECF campaigns, and the number of venture capital investors all had
a positive impact on obtaining post-campaign financing, while firm age had a negative
impact. Subsequent successful ECF campaigns were significant predictors decreasing firm
failure. - Also published as: Max Planck Institute for Innovation & Competition Research Paper No. 17-09
Dynamics of Investor Communication in Equity Crowdfunding, Electronic Markets, 28 (4), 523-540. DOI
(2018).- In crowdfunding, start-ups can voluntarily communicate with their investors by posting updates. We investigate whether start-ups strategically use updates, which were previously shown to increase investments. To this end, we use hand-collected data of 751 updates and 39,036 investment decisions from the two major German equity crowdfunding portals Seedmatch and Companisto. We find evidence for strategic communication behavior of startups during an equity crowdfunding campaign. During the funding period, start-ups post updates with linguistic devices that enhance the group identity and the group cohesion. Furthermore, the probability of an update during the funding period increases with a strong competition of other contemporary crowdfunding campaigns.
Financial Contracting in Crowdinvesting: Lessons from the German Market, German Law Journal, 19 (3), 509-578.
(2018).- The present Article aims to shed light on the question whether crowdinvesting regulation should favor a specific legal form or contract type for crowdinvesting. To this end, it analyzes the conditions which legal forms and contract types must fulfill to be used in crowdinvesting. As crowdinvesting in Germany benefits from a high degree of contractual freedom, the Article gives an overview not only of the types but also of the contents of crowdinvesting contracts that are in use in Germany and traces how they have evolved. Based on a sample of 81% of all crowd financing in the German market, it evaluates 255 crowdinvesting campaigns held on 18 different platforms in the period from August 1, 2011 to December 31, 2015.
- Also published in Oxford Business Law Blog 2016
Internet-Based Entrepreneurial Finance: Lessons from Germany, California Management Review, 60 (2), 150-175. DOI
(2018).- The Internet-based crowdinvesting market in Europe has developed significantly since its start in 2007 and has become an alternative source of finance for entrepreneurs to sell securities through the Internet to small investors. This market evidences a great variety in platform design and contract forms used by crowdinvesting platforms. By analyzing more detailed, hand-collected data on the complete set of successful and unsuccessful crowdinvesting campaigns run in Germany, this article tests whether different platform and contractual mechanisms affect crowd participation. The results show that crowd participation is largest when the minimum ticket size is small, the crowd is pooled in a financial vehicle, and the crowd is offered investments in the form of profit-participating loans. Moreover, the very same mechanisms increase the chances of achieving successful campaigns and raising a larger amount.
- Also published at SSRN under the title: The Emergence of Crowdinvesting in Europe: With an In-Depth Analysis of the German Market
- Also published as LMU Discussion Paper 43 under the title: The Emergence of Crowdinvesting in Europe
Which Updates During an Equity Crowdfunding Campaign Increase Crowd Participation?, Small Business Economics, 50 (1), 3-27. DOI
(2018).- Start-ups often post updates during equity crowdfunding campaigns. Yet, little is known about the effects of such updates on funding success. We investigate this question using hand-collected data from 71 funding campaigns on two German equity crowdfunding portals. Using a combination of qualitative and quantitative empirical research techniques, we find that posting an update has a significant positive effect on the number of investments by the crowd and the investment amount collected by the start-up. This effect does not occur immediately in its entirety but is lagged by a few days. The positive effect increases with the number of words of the update. Distinguishing by the content of the update, we find that the positive effect can be attributed to updates about new funding and business developments as well as updates that inform about promotional campaigns run by the start-up. Updates about the start-up team, the business model, cooperation projects, and product developments do not show meaningful effects. Our paper contributes to the literature about the effects of information disclosure on equity crowdfunding success and helps start-ups to design effective and successful equity crowdfunding campaigns.
Market Standards in Financial Contracting: The Euro’s Effect on Debt Securities, Journal of International Money and Finance, 85, 145-162. DOI
(2018).- The introduction of the Euro ushered in a rise to dominance of English contract law in European debt securities. Corporate issuers in the Euro zone chose English law significantly more often than a control group of other European countries. The Euro effect on choice of law is particularly strong for debt securities in local markets that, arguably, were most affected by the Euro. The Euro effect is not explained by differences in the suitability of English law compared to other laws, a change in issuer composition or debt securities types, and the greater market share of British and American underwriters. We argue that increased standardization benefits (network effects) from a boost in cross-border investment provide the best account of why English law conquered the European debt securities market.
Market Mechanisms and Funding Dynamics in Equity Crowdfunding, Journal of Corporate Finance, 50, 556-574. DOI
(2018).- Equity crowdfunding is a new form of entrepreneurial finance, in which investors do not receive perks or engage in pre-purchase of the product, but rather participate in the future cash flows of a firm. In this paper, we analyze what determines individual investment decisions in this new financial market. One important factor that may influence the behavior of investors is the way the portal allocates securities. We use unique data from four German equity crowdfunding portals to examine how the allocation mechanism affects funding dynamics. In contrast with the crowdfunding campaigns on Kickstarter, on which the typical pattern of project support is U shaped, we find that equity crowdfunding dynamics are L shaped under a first-come, first-served mechanism and U shaped under a second-price auction. The evidence also shows that investors base their decisions on information provided by the entrepreneur in the form of updates as well as by the investment behavior and comments of other crowd investors.
Die Befreiungsvorschriften des Kleinanlegerschutzgesetzes, Ifo-Schnelldienst, 70 (6), 26-35.
(2017).- http://www.wiso-net.de/document/IFOS__3D9D3471C5D8859AB5EEC3BF0DAAC4DE
- Also published as ifo Forschungsbericht 78
Pricing Shares in Equity Crowdfunding, Small Business Economics, 48 (4), 795-811. DOI
(2017).- We analyze the pricing of cash flow rights in start-up companies using a unique data set of 44 equity crowdfunding campaigns. Our sample consists of 499 backers who invested during the period from November 6, 2011, to March 25, 2014, on the German equity crowdfunding portal Innovestment. In contrast with all other European equity crowdfunding portals, Innovestment runs a multi-unit second-price auction in which backers themselves can specify the price of an investment ticket. We exploit this unique auction mechanism to analyze backers’ willingness to pay for cash flow rights. We find that campaign characteristics, investor sophistication, progress in funding, herding, and stock market volatility influence backers’ willingness to pay in an economically meaningful manner, while geographic distance, learning effects, and sniping at the end of an auction have no effect.
Should Securities Regulation Promote Equity Crowdfunding?, Small Business Economics, 49 (3), 579-593. DOI
(2017).- In this paper, we show that too strong investor protection may harm small firms and entrepreneurial initiatives, which contrasts with the traditional ‘law & finance’ view that stronger investor protection is better. This situation is particularly relevant in crowdinvesting, which refers to a recent financial innovation originating on the Internet and targets small, innovative firms. In many jurisdictions, securities regulation offers exemptions to prospectus and registration requirements. We provide an into-depth discussion of recent regulatory reforms in different countries and discuss how they may impact crowdinvesting. Building on a theoretical framework, we show that optimal regulation depends on the availability of alternative early-stage financing such as venture capital and angel finance. Finally, we offer exploratory portal-level evidence from Germany on the impact of securities regulation on small business finance.
- Also published at SSRN
Financial Contracting in Crowdinvesting: Lessons from the German Market, Oxford Business Law Blog 2016.
(2016).- https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/business-law-blog/blog/2016/10/financial-contracting-crowdinvesting-lessons-german-market
- Also published in German Law Journal, 19(3), 509-578
What Deters Crime? Comparing the Effectiveness of Legal, Social, and Internal Sanctions Across Countries, Frontiers in Psychology (Cognitive Science), 85 (7). DOI
(2016).Cut from the Same Cloth: Similarly Dishonest Individuals Across Countries, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47 (6), 858-874.
(2016).Crowdinvesting-Verträge - Inhalt, Entwicklung und praktische Bedeutung, Zeitschrift für Bankrecht und Bankwirtschaft, 27 (3), 142-178.
(2016).The Regulation of Crowdfunding in the German Small Investor Protection Act: Content, Consequences, Critique, Suggestions, European Company Law, 13 (2), 56-66.
(2016).- The German Bundestag has adopted the Small Investor Protection Act on 23 April 2015, which will enter into force in the coming weeks. By this Act the German legislator establishes for the first time – among other things – a regulation of the German crowdfunding market. This article describes the content of the act as relevant to crowdfunding, identifies its probable consequences, and examines the most important rules with respect to their regulatory effects. The authors conclude that despite some modifications that have been made in the course of the legislative process there still is an urgent need of improvement regarding some provisions.
- Also published at SSRN
Reprint of: "The Regulation of Crowdfunding in the German Small Investor Protection Act: Content, Consequences, Critique, Suggestions", Rivista del Diritto Societario, 2015 (4), 767-788.
(2015).Covenants in European Investment-Grade Corporate Bonds, Capital Markets Law Journal, 10 (3), 345-361.
(2015).Analyzing Preliminary References as the Powerbase of the European Court of Justice, European Journal of Law and Economics, 39 (2), 287-311. DOI
(2015).- The European Court of Justice (ECJ) is a very powerful court compared to other international courts and even national courts of last resort. Observers almost unanimously agree that it is the preliminary references procedure that made the ECJ the powerful court it is today. In this paper, we analyze the determinants that lead national courts to use the procedure. We add to previous studies by constructing a comprehensive panel dataset (1982–2008), including more potentially relevant explanatory variables and by testing for the robustness of previous results. In addition to confirming the relevance of variables previously found significant, we identify a number of additional determinants, including the relevance of agriculture to a country, corporate tax rate, familiarity with EU law, and tenure of democracy.
- SSRN - Also published as CesIfo Working Paper No. 3769 - Category 2: Public Choice under the title: Preliminary References - Analyzing the Determinants that Made the ECJ the Powerful Court It Is
Die Regelung des Crowdfunding im Regierungsentwurf des Kleinanlegerschutzgesetzes: Inhalt, Auswirkungen, Kritik, Änderungsvorschläge, Der Betrieb, 68 (1), 47-53.
(2015).Where Do Firms Issue Debt? An Empirical Analysis of Issuer Location and Regulatory Competition in the European Corporate Debt Market, International Review of Law and Economics, 41, 103-115. DOI
(2015).- In this article, we study the choice of issuer location and regulatory competition in the European corporate debt market. We find that, in absolute terms, Germany has by far the highest outflow of debt issues, while the Netherlands, the UK, Luxembourg and Ireland see the most inflows (in that order). We use a panel gravity model to investigate country specific factors attracting foreign subsidiaries as issuer. The data clearly support the prediction that the locational choice is positively influenced by a low withholding tax rate. There is also some evidence that corporate tax rates play a role. We do not find support for creditor protection rules in bankruptcy as a driver of cross-border debt securities issues. Hence, countries who wish to attract issuers are well-advised to reduce their withholding tax rates – creditor rights seem not to matter.
- Also published at SSRN as ECGI - Finance Working Paper No. 292/2010
Regulating Fraud in Financial Markets: Can Behavioural Designs Prevent Future Criminal Offences?, Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions, 7 (2), 192-201.
(2014).- This article explores the anatomy of three recent financial scandals and investigates how the legal system has responded to them. Furthermore, it analyses whether behavioural designs can prevent future criminal offenses. The article comes to the conclusion that the social as well as the physical environment can diminish the human propensity to commit a fraud. Moreover, misconduct was often made attractive to fraudsters by means of external rewards. Reforming performance incentives might therefore be an efficient measure to reduce deception in financial markets.
- Also published at SSRN
Does Charter Competition Foster Entrepreneurship? A Difference-in-Difference Approach to European Company Law Reforms, Journal of Common Market Studies, 51 (3), 399-415. DOI
(2013).- We study how company law reforms, particularly the reduction or abolition of minimum capital requirements, in various European jurisdictions affect the decision of entrepreneurs to incorporate by means of a private limited liability company (LLC). Since the landmark rulings of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in the years 1999, 2002 and 2003, entrepreneurs in the European Union (EU) have been able to choose the country of incorporation independently of their real seat. As a result, the proliferation of the UK private company limited by shares has posed a competitive threat to many European legislators. We analyze whether the reforms adopted in Spain, France, Hungary, Germany and Poland have promoted the popularity of domestic legal forms and encouraged entrepreneurship more generally. Using a difference-in-difference approach, we record a strong impact in both respects, especially if the minimum capital requirement was reduced or abolished.
- Also published at SSRN as ECGI - Finance Working Paper No. 308/2011
Covenants in europäischen Investment-grade-Unternehmensanleihen, Zeitschrift für Bankrecht und Bankwirtschaft, 26 (3), 202-210.
(2013).- Covenants are a type of contractual protection for creditors in debt financing. They are used in bond contracts to control the issuer’s management activity and to attenuate conflicting goals existing between shareholders and bondholders. The article provides an overview of covenants and the way they function against the background of financial theory. It further provides detailed data on how often covenants are actually used in corporate bonds issued predominantly by European issuers. Examining the rights of fixed-income investors vis-à-vis bond issuers contributes to the increasingly significant and growing research on debt governance, which addresses, inter alia, the optimal drafting of bond contracts.
- SSRN - English version: Covenants in European Investment-Grade Corporate Bonds
Market Standards in Public Sector Debt Contracting, CESifo DICE Report, 11 (3), 16-20.
(2013).Unternehmensgründungen unter dem Einfluss des Wettbewerbs der Gesellschaftsrechte, Zeitschrift für das gesamte Handelsrecht und Wirtschaftsrecht, 177 (1), 131-148.
(2013).Crowdinvesting in Deutschland – Markt, Rechtslage und Regulierungsperspektiven, Zeitschrift für Bankrecht und Bankwirtschaft, 24 (4), 237-266.
(2012).Contracting Employee Involvement: An Analysis of Bargaining over Employee Involvement Rules for a Societas Europaea, Journal of Corporate Law Studies, 12 (2), 201-235.
(2012).Mediation als Verbraucherschutz – oder Verbraucherschutz vor Mediation?, Neue Zeitschrift für Schiedsverfahren, 10 (1), 26-32.
(2012).Material Adverse Change Klauseln in deutschen Übernahmeangeboten: Eine rechtstatsächliche Untersuchung, Zeitschrift für Bankrecht und Bankwirtschaft, 2011 (5), 412-416.
(2011).Vexierbild Richtermediation – Eine Studie zur Wahrnehmung verschiedener Mediationsformen in Deutschland, Zeitschrift für Zivilprozeß, 2011 (4), 505-518.
(2011).Das deutsche Glücksspielmonopol – Eine ordnungspolitische und rechtsökonomische Analyse, Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik, 60 (1), 86-109.
(2011).How Does the Market React to the Societas Europaea?, European Business Organization Law Review, 11 (1), 35-50.
(2010).- When Council Regulation (EC) No 2157/2001 on the Statute for a European Company (Societas Europaea - SE) became effective on 8 October 2004, it offered publicly traded companies, for the first time, a choice between competing company laws, namely the national law of the company’s home state and the law of the supranational SE. Using an event study methodology, we analyse a unique dataset of publicly traded firms that have announced to re-incorporate under the SE Regulation. We find the re-incorporation decision to have a positive impact on firms’ stock market value. The abnormal returns associated with re-incorporating as an SE increase over the years, which we interpret as the result of declining legal uncertainty and a rising reputational value of the SE corporate form.
- Also published as ECGI Law Working Paper No. 127/2009 under the title "The Societas Europaea: Good News for European Firms"
Vom Wert der Wahlfreiheit: Eine empirische Analyse der Societas Europaea als Rechtsformalternative, Die Aktiengesellschaft, 54 (23), 845-855.
(2009).Incorporating Under European Law: The Societas Europaea as a Vehicle for Legal Arbitrage, European Business Organization Law Review, 10 (1), 1-33. DOI
(2009).- After a slow start, the European Company (Societas Europaea, SE) has become increasingly popular. Beside documenting the growth of this new company type, we examine whether firms choose to incorporate in the SE corporate form because they engage in 'legal arbitrage' by exploiting differences in legal rules between jurisdictions. We specify a number of hypotheses on particular legal arbitrage motives. To validate our hypotheses, we use a broad telephone survey among SE users in Germany as well as a simple country-level regression model based on a unique, hand-collected dataset on SE incorporations. We find strong evidence that firms use the SE to mitigate the effect of mandatory co-determination rules. Establishing a one-tier board structure (in jurisdictions that impose a two-tier structure on their national public companies) and taking advantage of the SE's mobility for tax purposes also seem to be driving SE formations. By contrast, our analysis fails to support the suggestion that firms use the SE to shop for the most favourable national company law to fill the gaps in the SE Regulation.
- SSRN
Die Societas Europaea: Empirische Bestandsaufnahme und Entwicklungslinien einer neuen Rechtsform, Die Aktiengesellschaft, 53 (20), 721-730.
(2008).Europäischer Nichtwohnhochbau weiterhin auf Wachstumskurs, Ifo-Schnelldienst, 60 (5), 31-36.
(2007).Auswirkungen der Globalisierung auf die Bauwirtschaft, Ifo-Schnelldienst, 60 (3), 41-49.
(2007).Edited Books, Collected Editions
The Economics of Crowdfunding: Startups, Portals and Investor Behavior. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
(2018).- This book focuses on various types of crowdfunding and the lessons learned from academic research. Crowdfunding, a new and important source of financing for entrepreneurs, fills a funding gap that was traditionally difficult to close. Chapters from expert contributors define and carefully evaluate the various market segments: donation-based and reward-based crowdfunding, crowdinvesting and crowdlending. They further provide an assessment of startups, market structure, as well as backers and investors for each segment. Attention is given to the theoretical and empirical findings from the recent economics and finance literature. Furthermore, the authors evaluate relevant regulatory efforts in several jurisdictions. This book will appeal to finance, entrepreneurship and legal scholars as well as entrepreneurs and platform operators.
Contributions to Collected Editions
Allgemeiner Marktüberblick, in: Florian Möslein, Sebastian Omlor (
Marktüberblick, in: Thorsten Voß (
Allgemeiner Marktüberblick, in: Florian Möslein, Sebastian Omlor (
Regulatory Competition, in: Alain Marciano, Giovanni Battista Ramello (
- Regulatory competition describes the activity of private or public lawmakers who intend to produce novel or alter current legislation in response to competitive pressure from other private or public lawmakers. In this chapter, we provide an overview of the legal arbitrage tactics of various entities, which are a necessary, though not sufficient, condition for regulatory competition. Moreover, we investigate whether and how lawmakers respond to these endeavors by adapting their national corporate, insolvency, capital markets, and environmental law as well as product standards.
Authentic Leadership and Followers’ Cheating Behaviour: A Laboratory Experiment from a Self-Concept Maintenance Perspective, in: Dorianne Cotter-Lockard (
- Extensive evidence shows that when given the opportunity, people cheat for monetary rewards, but only to the extent that they can keep a positive self-concept. In this study, we investigate various factors that may influence the degree to which people can keep their positive self-concept while cheating for monetary gains. We find that authentic leadership, gender, cheating norm, experience of cheating, and expectations of others’ cheating behavior have no effect on participants’ spontaneous dishonesty on an abstract task. Therefore, reducing people’s cheating behavior might be a long-term project for the management of fraudulent organizations and more difficult than might be expected.
The End of Regulatory Competition in European Company Law?, in: Martina Eckardt, Christian Schubel (
- In this article, we analyze regulatory competition in company law in the European Union (EU). By examining the empirical evidence, we conclude that regulatory competition, which is triggered by legal arbitrage and the competitive pressure exerted by national lawmakers, has run out of steam in the EU. Unlike in the United States, both language barriers and double accounting obligations for branches have hampered entrepreneurs from engaging in legal arbitrage. As a result, a necessary precondition for horizontal regulatory competition is absent. Furthermore, vertical regulatory competition is not on the agenda of national legislators, as the Statute for a European Company is largely based on national company laws. Revising the national company law therefore improves the supranational competitor as well and destroys the incentives for national legislators to engage in vertical regulatory competition.
- SSRN - Also published as Andrássy Working Paper Series No. 33
Crowdinvesting – Angel Investing for the Masses?, in: Colin Mason, Hans Landström (
- This book chapter reviews crowdinvesting, which is sometimes referred to as equity crowdfunding. It specifically aims at answering the following question: Is crowdinvesting transforming the crowd into small business angels? In order to answer this question, we review the securities regulation in different jurisdictions and compare crowdinvesting practices in these countries with angel finance. Finally, we offer insights into different avenues for future research. One pertains to the question whether crowdinvesting will complement or substitute angel finance. While this issue cannot be answered unambiguously, we expect that in many cases, crowdinvesting may become a complementary source of funding to angel finance rather than a substitute. This is because crowdinvestors fill funding gaps at the lower end of the market or may at times co-invest with professional investors. In other cases, crowdinvestors may compete with business angels for the same investments since average funding volumes can be similar.
- SSRN
Equity Premium Puzzle, in: Morris Altman (
Contracting Employee Involvement: An Analysis of Bargaining over Employee Involvement Rules for a Societas Europaea, in: Horst Eidenmüller (
- Following a slow start, the European Company (Societas Europaea – SE) has become a popular legal form amongst European firms. It is rendered attractive by corporate governance features such as the contractual freedom of capital and labor to design a firm-specific employee involvement regime. By analyzing what has been settled for in such agreements, we investigate whether national mandatory employee involvement rules are efficient and which factors impede firm-specific bargained-for solutions.
- Also published at SSRN as ECGI - Law Working Paper No. 185/2012
Europäischer Rechtswettbewerb bei der Wahl des Emissionsstandorts für Schuldtitel: eine empirische Analyse, in: Peter Behrens, Thomas Eger, Hans-Bernd Schäfer (
How Does the Market React to the Societas Europaea?, in: Ulf Bernitz, Wolf-Georg Ringe (
Incorporating Under European Law: The Societas Europaea as a Vehicle for Legal Arbitrage, in: Alessio M. Pacces (
Further Publications, Press Articles, Interviews
Oxford Business Law Blog 2020.
(2020). The Relevance of Investor Rights in Equity Crowdfunding,Oxford Business Law Blog 2020.
(2020). FinTech and Data Privacy in Germany,Oxford Business Law Blog 2020.
(2020). Initial Coin Offerings, Information Disclosure, and Fraud,Machine Lawyering 2020.
(2020). FinTech and Data Privacy in Germany,Machine Lawyering 2020.
(2020). How Do Banks Interact With Fintechs? Forms of Alliances and Their Impact on Bank Value,Machine Lawyering 2020.
(2020). The Relevance of Investor Rights in Equity Crowdfunding,Weser Kurier 04.07.2019.
(2019). Eine Bank kann auch Facebook heißen,CESifo DICE Report, 15 (3), 35-42.
(2017). Exemptions Featured in the 2015 German Small Investor Protection Act,Oxford Business Law Blog 2017.
(2017). The Emergence of the Global Fintech Market: Economic and Technological Determinants,FinTech-Markt in Deutschland - Abschlussbericht 17. Oktober 2016, 2016.
(2016).EDITION F 2016 06.05.2016.
(2016). Crowdinvesting: Wenn professionelle Investoren merken, Wow, das läuft, steigen sie ebenfalls ein - Interview,CESifo DICE Report, 14 (2), 16-22.
(2016). Success and Failure in Equity Crowdfunding,CESifo DICE Report, 14 (1), 67-69.
(2016). Crowdinvesting,Oxford Business Law Blog 2016.
(2016). The Economic Impact of Forming a European Company,European Journal of Law and Economics, 40 (1), 179-182.
(2015). Regulatory Competition in the Internal Market: Comparing Models for Corporate Law, Securities Law and Competition Law,Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 63 (1), NP1-NP7.
(2015). War Within, War Outside: A Psychoanalytic Account of Delusional Themes in Germany and Israel During the Twentieth Century,VentureCapital Magazin, (4), 58-59.
(2014). Braucht Deutschland ein Crowdinvesting Gesetz?,Der Betrieb, 67 (14), 1.
(2014). Ein sicherer Rechtsrahmen für das Crowdinvesting,Warum Deutschland (k)ein Crowdinvesting-Gesetz braucht.
(2014).VentureCapital Magazin, (2), 34-35.
(2013). Crowdinvesting und Portfoliodiversifizierung – Eine rechtsökonomische Analyse,Finanzplatz-Report, (5), 20-21.
(2009). Warum unterstellen sich Unternehmen europäischem Recht? Ein erster empirischer Befund,Studie über die Auswirkungen des Glücksspielstaatsvertrages zum Lotterie- und Sportwettmarkt auf die deutsche Volkswirtschaft, Gutachten für die MKW Wirtschaftsforschung GmbH.
(2008).Monographies
Praxiserfahrungen mit den Befreiungsvorschriften des Kleinanlegerschutzgesetzes: Eine aktuelle Bestandsaufnahme (ifo Forschungsbericht, 102). München: ifo Institut.
(2019).FinTech and Data Privacy in Germany. An Empirical Analysis with Policy Recommendations. Heidelberg: Springer.
(2019).- This book examines the FinTech revolution from a data privacy perspective. It analyzes key players on the FinTech market and the developments in various market segments. Particular attention is paid to an empirical analysis of the privacy statements of 505 German FinTech firms and how they were adapted after the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) entered into effect in May 2018. The analysis also includes 38 expert interviews with relevant stakeholders from supervisory and regulatory authorities, the financial and FinTech industry, leading consulting firms and consumer protection agencies. By adopting this approach, the book identifies key regulatory needs, offers a valuable asset for practitioners and academics alike, and shares intriguing insights for lawyers, economists and everyone interested in FinTech and data privacy.
- German edition
FinTech und Datenschutz - Eine empirische Untersuchung mit Empfehlungen für Politik und Praxis. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.
(2019).Praxiserfahrungen mit den Befreiungsvorschriften des Kleinanlegerschutzgesetzes (ifo Forschungsbericht, 78). München: ifo Institut.
(2017).- Dieser Forschungsbericht untersucht die Auswirkungen der im Sommer 2015 eingeführten Befreiungsvorschriften des Kleinanlegerschutzgesetzes. Durch eine stärkere Regulierung soll das Kleinanlegerschutzgesetz für mehr Transparenz für Anlegerinnen und Anleger auf dem grauen Kapitalmarkt sorgen. Das Gesetz beinhaltet jedoch auch Ausnahmeregelungen. Diese entbinden sowohl Unternehmen, die sich über Crowdinvesting-Plattform finanzieren, als auch soziale, gemeinnützige und kirchliche Projekte von der Pflicht einer Prospekterstellung bei dem Angebot von Vermögensanlagen. Grundlage der Untersuchung dieser Ausnahmeregelungen ist die Crowdinvesting-Datenbank, eine Befragung unter sozialen und gemeinnützigen Organisation sowie Expertengespräche. Zusammenfassend lassen sich rund ein Jahr nach Einführung des Kleinanlegerschutzgesetzes keine starken Effekte für den Markt für Schwarmfinanzierungen in Deutschland erkennen. Die von uns analysierten Daten zeigen auch, dass sich das Anlageverhalten durch die neu eingeführte Pflicht zur Selbstauskunft über das Einkommen und Vermögen der Investierenden nicht verändert hat. Allerdings haben sich die bei Schwarmfinanzierungen verwendeten Vermögensanlagen in den letzten Jahren weg von stillen Beteiligungen und hin zu partiarischen Darlehen und Nachrangdarlehen entwickelt. Im Bereich sozialer und gemeinnütziger Projekte finden die geschaffenen Ausnahmeregelungen so gut wie keine Anwendung, da andere Regelungen eine wesentlich einfachere Entbindung von der Prospektpflicht ermöglichen.
- This study investigates the effects of exemption provisions within the Small Investor Protection Act that was introduced in July 2015. By increasing the regulatory obligations for issuers, the Small Investor Protection Act should lead to a higher level of transparency for investors in the so called “grey capital market”. However, the act does include exemptions from certain regulatory obligations. Crowdinvesting-platforms, social, charitable and ecclesiastic projects are not obliged to publish a prospectus for the offering of an investment instrument. The investigation into the effects of these exemption rules is based on a crowdinvesting-database, a survey of social and charitable organizations and interviews with experts. In short, the effects of this act and its exemptions one year after its introduction are negligible for the market of crowdinvesting in Germany. Furthermore, the data analysed shows that investment behaviour has not changed as a result of obligations to self-disclose income and wealth on the part of investors. Investment instruments, however, have changed in the crowdinvesting market in recent years from silent partnerships to profit-participating-loans and subordinated loans. Social and charitable projects do not seem to be making use of the newly established exemptions due to the fact that there are other, and in most cases simpler, regulations that release them from the obligation to publish a prospectus.
- http://www.cesifo-group.de/DocDL/ifo_Forschungsberichte_78_2017_Hainz_etal_Kleinanlegerschutzgesetz.pdf
- Also published in: ifo Schnelldienst 70,6 (2017), 26-35
FinTech in Germany. Cham: Springer. DOI
(2017).- In this study, conducted on behalf of the Federal Ministry of Finance, we provide the first comprehensive analysis of the German FinTech industry. We quantify the market volume of the industry between 2007 and 2015. On the basis of this data, we also predict the future development of eight segments of the FinTech market, offering detailed forecasts for the years 2020, 2025, and 2035. Moreover, we provide a comprehensive overview of current trends and the drivers of growth that have affected the FinTech industry in the past, as well as the factors that could spur and hinder growth within it in the future.
Regulatory Competition in European Corporate and Capital Market Law: An Empirical Analysis (European Studies in Law and Economics, 7). Cambridge: Intersentia.
(2012).Die Auswirkungen des Bundesverfassungsgerichtsurteils zum Sportwettenmarkt auf die deutsche Volkswirtschaft (ifo Forschungsbericht, 32). München: ifo.
(2006).Discussion Papers
The Social Dilemma of Big Data: Donating Personal Data to Promote Social Welfare, Max Planck Institute for Innovation & Competition Research Paper, No. 21-08.
(2021).- When using digital devices and services, individuals provide their personal data to organizations in exchange for gains in various domains of life. Organizations use these data to run technologies such as smart assistants, augmented reality, and robotics. Most often, these organizations seek to make a profit. Individuals can, however, also provide personal data to public databases that enable nonprofit organizations to promote social welfare if sufficient data are contributed. Regulators have therefore called for efficient ways to help the public collectively benefit from its own data. By implementing an online experiment among 1,696 US citizens, we find that individuals would donate their data even when at risk of getting leaked. The willingness to provide personal data depends on the risk level of a data leak but not on a realistic impact of the data on social welfare. Individuals are less willing to donate their data to the private industry than to academia or the government. Finally, individuals are not sensitive to whether the data are processed by a human-supervised or a self-learning smart assistant.
- Also published as: CESifo Working Paper Series No. 8926
Are Sustainability-Oriented Investors Different? Evidence from Equity Crowdfunding, CESifo Working Paper, No. 8339.
(2020).- In this article, we examine how investor motives affect investment behavior in equity crowdfunding. In particular, we compare the investment behavior of sustainability-oriented with ordinary crowd investors on six leading equity crowdfunding platforms in Austria and Germany and investigate whether they suffer from a default shock that was recently identified by Dorfleitner et al. (2019). In general, we find evidence of a default shock in equity crowdfunding that occurs immediately after the event and if investors experience more than two insolvencies. Moreover, we find that sustainability-oriented investors pledge larger amounts of money and invest in more campaigns than ordinary crowd investors. The results also suggest that sustainability-oriented crowd investors care about non-financial returns, as they react more sensitively after experiencing a default in their equity crowdfunding portfolios, which indicates that they suffer beyond the pure financial loss. These findings contribute to recent literature on equity crowdfunding, socially responsible investing, and how individual investment motives and personal experiences affect investment decisions.
- Available at SSRN
Are Characteristics Covariances or Characteristics?, CESifo Working Paper, No. 8377.
(2020).- In this article, we shed more light on the covariances versus characteristics debate by investigating the explanatory power of the instrumented principal component analysis (IPCA), recently proposed by Kelly et al. (2019). They conclude that characteristics are covariances because there is no residual return predictability from characteristics above and beyond that in factor loadings. Our findings indicate that there is no residual return predictability from factor loadings above and beyond that in characteristics either. In particular, we find that stock returns are best explained by characteristics (characteristics are characteristics) and that a one-factor IPCA model is sufficient to explain stock risk (characteristics are covariances). We therefore conclude that characteristics are covariances or characteristics, depending on whether the goal is to explain stock returns or risk.
- Available at SSRN
Initial Coin Offerings, Information Disclosure, and Fraud, CESifo Working Paper, No. 7962.
(2019).- We study the extent of fraud in initial coin offerings (ICOs), and whether information disclosure prior to the issuance predicts fraud. We document different types of fraud, and that fraudulent ICOs are on average much larger than the sample average. Issuers that disclose their code on GitHub are more likely to be targeted by phishing and hacker activities, which suggests that there are risks related to disclosing the code. Generally, we find it extremely difficult to predict fraud with the information available at the time of issuance. This calls for the need to install a third-party that certifies the quality of the issuers, such as specialized platforms, or the engagement of institutional investors and venture capital funds that can perform a due diligence and thus verify the quality of the project.
- Available at SSRN
Are Equity Crowdfunding Investors Active Investors?, CESifo Working Paper Series, 7884.
(2019).- It is often assumed that entrepreneurs retain more control of their venture when they opt for equity crowdfunding as compared to venture capital, notably because crowd investors are passive. We study whether crowd investors are indeed passive by analysing the cash flow and control rights crowd investors receive in equity crowdfunding in Germany, where more flexible contracts are offered than in many other countries. We document that in Germany many of the rights used in venture capital investment contracts are also used in equity crowdfunding contracts. We find that crowd investors are asked to pay higher prices if they receive more cash flow and exit rights, consistent with the fact that these rights are valuable to the crowd. However, these rights have no meaningful economic impact, since they do not affect campaign outcome, the likelihood of
securing follow-on funding, nor the likelihood of liquidation of the venture. These results are
inconsistent with control rights theory that predicts positive impacts, in contrast to results
documented for venture capital contracts. Rather, our results suggest that crowd investors are passive investors whose control rights are ineffective or not exercised. - Also published as: Max Planck Institute for Innovation & Competition Research Paper No. 19-15
Crowdsourced Innovation: How Community Managers Affect Crowd Activities, Max Planck Institute for Innovation & Competition Research Paper, No. 18-16.
(2018).- In this study, we investigate whether and to what extent community managers in online collaborative communities can stimulate crowd activities through their engagement. Using a novel data set of 22 large online idea crowdsourcing campaigns, we find that active engagement of community managers positively affects crowd activities in an inverted U-shaped manner. Moreover, we evidence that intellectual stimulation by managers increases community participation, while individual consideration of users has no impact on user activities. Finally, the data reveal that community manager activities that require more effort, such as
- Available at SSRN
- Also published as CESifo Working Paper 7153
Paralyzed by Shock and Confused by Glut: The Portfolio Formation Behavior of Peer-to-Business Lending Investors, CESifo Working Paper Series, No. 7092.
(2018).- We study the investor behavior on a leading peer-to-business lending platform and find evidence of two new investment biases-a default shock bias and a deep market bias. First, we find investors to stop investing in new loans and to cease from diversifying their portfolio after experiencing a loan default. This default shock significantly worsens the risk-return profile of investors' loan portfolios. Second, investors are unable to cope with a glut of loan campaigns. Similar to the default shock bias, investors cease from investing in new loans and consequently underdiversify their portfolios as more loans become available on the platform. Deeper markets also result in a deterioration of investors' risk-return profiles. Third, investment experience on the platform reduces the effect of the deep market bias
- https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/cesifo1_wp7092.pdf
- Also published as: Max Planck Institute for Innovation & Competition Research Series No. 18-11
Paralyzed by Shock and Confused by Glut: The Portfolio Formation Behavior of Peer-to-Business Lending Investors, Max Planck Institute for Innovation & Competition Research Paper, No. 18-11.
(2018).- We study the investor behavior on a leading peer-to-business lending platform and find evidence of two new investment biases-a default shock bias and a deep market bias. First, we find investors to stop investing in new loans and to cease from diversifying their portfolio after experiencing a loan default. This default shock significantly worsens the risk-return profile of investors' loan portfolios. Second, investors are unable to cope with a glut of loan campaigns. Similar to the default shock bias, investors cease from investing in new loans and consequently underdiversify their portfolios as more loans become available on the platform. Deeper markets also result in a deterioration of investors' risk-return profiles. Third, investment experience on the platform reduces the effect of the deep market bias
- Available at SSRN
- Also published as: CESifo Working Paper Series No. 7092
Equity Crowdfunding in Germany and the UK: Follow-up Funding and Firm Failure, Max Planck Institute for Innovation & Competition Research Paper, No. 17-09.
(2018).- Today, startups often obtain financing via the Internet through many small contributions of non-sophisticated investors. Yet little is known about whether these startups can ultimately
build enduring businesses. In this article, we hand-collected data from 14 different equity
crowdfunding (ECF) portals and 426 firms that ran at least one successful ECF campaign in
Germany or the United Kingdom. We empirically analyze different factors affecting
follow-up funding and firm failure. The findings show that German firms that received ECF
stood a higher chance of obtaining follow-up funding through business angels or venture
capitalists, but also had a higher likelihood of failure. The number of senior managers,
subsequent successful ECF campaigns, and the number of venture capital investors all had
a positive impact on obtaining post-campaign financing, while firm age had a negative
impact. Subsequent successful ECF campaigns were significant predictors decreasing firm
failure. - Available at SSRN
- Also published in: Corporate Finance: An international Review, Special Issue: New Methods of Entrepreneurial Firm Financing: Fintech, Crowdfunding and Corporate Governance Implications, September 2018, Pages 331-354
The Adaptive Liar: An Interactionist Approach of Multiple Dishonesty Domains, CESifo Working Paper Series, 7215.
(2018).- An extant debate in the morality literature centers on whether honesty is a stable and generalizable trait or whether honest behavior in one situation is independent from honest behavior in another situation. However, a third possibility is that tendencies toward dishonesty vary according to life domain. We conducted a cross-cultural study with participants in five countries (China, Colombia, Germany, Portugal, and the United States) to test whether dishonest tendencies vary according to domain. We hypothesized that countries vary in dishonesty according to domain, and that individuals’ tendencies toward dishonesty cluster by domain. Our survey asked participants to report the likelihood of engaging in dishonest behaviors across eight domains of life. The data support both our hypotheses. Our results thus corroborate that dishonesty is driven by the interplay of both individual differences and the circumstances surrounding deception.
- http://www.ifo.de/w/bK6rFncT
Crowdsourced Innovation: How Community Managers Affect Crowd Activities, CESifo Working Paper, 7153.
(2018).- In this study, we investigate whether and to what extent community managers in online
collaborative communities can stimulate crowd activities through their engagement. Using a
novel data set of 22 large online idea crowdsourcing campaigns, we find that active engagement of community managers positively affects crowd activities in an inverted Ushaped manner.
Moreover, we evidence that intellectual stimulation by managers increases community
participation, while individual consideration of users has no impact on user activities. Finally,
the data reveal that community manager activities that require more effort, such as media file uploads instead of simple written comments, have a larger effect on crowd participation. - https://www.cesifo-group.de/DocDL/cesifo1_wp7153.pdf
- Also published at SSRN as Max Planck Institute for Innovation & Competition Research Paper No. 18-16
How Do Banks Interact with Fintechs? Forms of Alliances and their Impact on Bank Value, CESifo Working Paper, No. 7170.
(2018).- The increasing pervasiveness of technology-driven firms that offer banking services has led to a growing pressure on traditional banks to modernize their core business activities. Banks attempt to confront the challenges of digitalization by cooperating with financial technology firms (fintechs) in various forms. In this paper, we investigate the factors that drive banks to form alliances with fintechs. Furthermore, we analyze whether such bank-fintech alliances affect the market valuation of banks. We provide descriptive evidence on the different forms of alliances occurring in practice. Using hand-collected data covering the largest banks from Canada, France, Germany, and the United Kingdom, we show that banks are significantly more likely to form alliances with fintechs when they pursue a well-defined digital strategy and/or employ a Chief Digital Officer. We evidence that markets react more strongly if digital banks rather than traditional banks announce a bank-fintech alliance. Finally, we find that alliances are most often characterized by a product-related collaboration between the bank and the fintech and that banks most often cooperate with fintechs providing payment services.
- http://www.ifo.de/w/3ZhNwtBeE
- Published in: Small Business Economics, Volume 57 (2021), Issue 3, Pages 1505–1526
Where Did Fintechs Come from, and Where Do They Go? The Transformation of the Financial Industry in Germany after Digitalization.
(2017).- The digitalization of financial services opened a window for new players in the financial industry. These start-ups take on tasks and functions previously reserved for banks, such as lending, payments, or investment. In this article, we trace the transformation of the industry after digitalization. By using data on FinTech formations in Germany, we show that entrepreneurial dynamics in the FinTech sector are not so much driven by technology as by the educational and business background of the founders. Furthermore, we investigate the reactions of traditional banks to the emergence of these start-ups. In contrast with other emerging industries such as biotechnology, a network analysis shows that FinTechs have mostly engaged in strategic partnerships and only a few banks have acquired or obtained a financial interest in a FinTech. We explain the restraint of banks to fully endorse the new possibilities of digitalized financial services with the characteristics of the technology itself and with the postponed fundamental decisions of banks to modernize their IT infrastructure.
- SSRN
- Published in: Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, Volume 3 (2020), Article 8
Can Television Reduce Xenophobia? The Case of East Germany, IAAEU Discussion Paper Series in Economics, No. 02/2017. Trier: Institute for Labour Law and Industrial Relations in the European Union (IAAEU).
(2017).- Can television have a mitigating effect on xenophobia? To examine this question, we exploit the fact that individuals in some areas of East Germany – due to their geographic location – could not receive West German television until 1989. We conjecture that individuals who received West German television were exposed more frequently to foreigners and thus have developed less xenophobia than people who were not exposed to those programs. Our results show that regions that could receive West German television were less likely to vote for right-wing parties during the national elections from 1998 to 2013. Only recently, the same regions were also more likely to vote for left-wing parties. Moreover, while counties that hosted more foreigners in 1989 were also more likely to vote for right-wing parties in most elections, we find counties that recently hosted more foreign visitors showed less xenophobia, which is in line with intergroup contact theory.
- https://ideas.repec.org/p/iaa/dpaper/201702.html
- Also published as: CESifo Working Paper No. 6632
Can Television Reduce Xenophobia? The Case of East Germany, CESifo Working Paper, No. 6632. Munich: Ifo Institute.
(2017).- Can television have a mitigating effect on xenophobia? To examine this question, we exploit the fact that individuals in some areas of East Germany – due to their geographic location – could not receive West German television until 1989. We conjecture that individuals who received West German television were exposed more frequently to foreigners and thus have developed less xenophobia than people who were not exposed to those programs. Our results show that regions that could receive West German television were less likely to vote for right-wing parties during the national elections from 1998 to 2013. Only recently, the same regions were also more likely to vote for left-wing parties. Moreover, while counties that hosted more foreigners in 1989 were also more likely to vote for right-wing parties in most elections, we find counties that recently hosted more foreign visitors showed less xenophobia, which is in line with intergroup contact theory.
- http://www.ifo.de/w/uLp7mA6q
- Also published as: IAAEU Discussion Paper Series in Economics, No. 02/2017
Marketplace Lending of SMEs.
(2017).- Marketplace lending refers to online platforms facilitating loans from individuals to private small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs). We conjecture that the information conveyed by the platform (ratings) plays a pronounced role in influencing the borrowing success of SMEs, and that more sophisticated financial information and issues of adverse selection are largely irrelevant in these markets. We introduce a first-ever dataset of 414 marketplace loans and track 8,236 online loan-days to test these propositions. The data examined provide strong support for the importance of simple ratings in influencing investor behavior. The data further indicate the importance of competing investment opportunities.
- SSRN
Disentangling Crowdfunding from Fraudfunding, Max Planck Institute for Innovation & Competition Research Paper, No. 16-09.
(2016).- Using Kickstarter and Indiegogo, the two largest crowdfunding platforms, we conduct an exhaustive search of all fraud cases from 2010 through 2015 that spans nine countries. In line with traditional economic theory, we posit that crowdfunding fraudsters are most concerned with getting caught and with the extent of the expected punishment. However, human nature suggests that maintaining a positive self-concept may be of equal concern. In line with this hypothesis, we present evidence that fraudsters are becoming more recognizable on portals and to the crowd because of several specific characteristics: They are less likely to carry out repeat funding campaigns, they are less likely to have a social media presence, and they are more likely to provide poorly worded and confusing campaign pitches with a greater number of enticements through pledge categories.
- SSRN
Does a Local Bias Exist in Equity Crowdfunding? The Impact of Investor Types and Portal Design, Max Planck Institute for Innovation & Competition Research Paper, No. 16-07.
(2016).- We use hand-collected data of 20,460 investment decisions and two distinct portals to analyze whether investors in equity crowdfunding direct their investments and portfolios to local firms. The results suggest that investors exhibit a local bias, even when controlling for family and friends. In addition to the regular crowd, our sample includes angel investors who invest considerable amounts and exhibit a larger local bias. By contrast, well-diversified investors are less likely to suffer from this behavioral anomaly. The data further show that portal design is important for attracting investors more prone to having a local bias. Finally, firms engaging in equity crowdfunding overcome funding barriers by attracting investors at all distances. These findings corroborate regulation targeted to specific investor groups, advise managers of equity crowdfunding portals about their business model, and inform individual investors of their biases.
- SSRN
Everyday Dishonesty: Towards a Theory of Multiple Honesty Domains.
(2015).The (True) Legacy of Two Really Existing Economic Systems, Munich Discussion Paper, No. 2014-26.
(2014).- By running an experiment among Germans collecting their passports or ID cards in the citizen centers of Berlin, we find that individuals with an East German family background cheat significantly more on an abstract task than those with a West German family background. The longer individuals were exposed to socialism, the more likely they were to cheat on our task. While it was recently argued that markets decay morals (Falk and Szech, 2013), we provide evidence that other political and economic regimes such as socialism might have an even more detrimental effect on individuals’ behavior.
- SSRN
Presentations and Lectures
20.11.2020
Crowdsourced Innovation: How Community Managers Affect Crowd Activities
ifo Institute, CESifo Area Conference on Economics of Digitization
Location: Munich
14.11.2020
Paralyzed by Shock: The Portfolio Formation Behavior of Peer-to-Business Lending Investors
University of Hamburg, Finance, Accounting und Insurance (FIA) Seminar
Location: Hamburg
30.10.2020
Are Equity Crowdfunding Investors Active Investors?
European University Institute Florence, Empirical Research in Corporate and Financial Law
Location: Florence, Italy
07.10.2020
Disentangling Crowdfunding from Fraudfunding
LMU Munich, Center for Advanced Management Studies
Location: Munich
04.10.2020
Paralyzed by Shock: The Portfolio Formation Behavior of Peer-to-Business Lending Investors
Utrecht University, 4th European Alternative Finance Research Conference
Location: Utrecht, Netherlands
29.09.2020
How Do Banks Interact with Fintechs?
Frankfurt School of Finance & Management, Herbsttagung Frankfurter Institut für Risikomanagement und Regulierung (FIRM)
Location: Frankfurt
03.09.2020
Are Sustainability-Oriented Investors Different? Evidence from Equity Crowdfunding
University of Southern Denmark, Danish Finance Institute Seminar
Location: Odense, Denmark
02.09.2020
Fintech und Datenschutz
Federation of German Consumer Organisations, Digitalisierung der Finanzdienstleistung
Location: Berlin
06.08.2020
Fintech and Data Privacy
Singapore Management University, AI in Finance: Privacy and Data Protection Sectoral Dialogue
Location: Singapore
16.06.2020
FinTechs: Quo Vadis?
Hochschule Bremen, Determinants of Non-cash Transactions Conference
Location: Bremen
27.03.2020
How Successful Do Banks Interact with FinTechs?
University of Oxford, Conference on Fintech Startups and Incumbent Players: Policy Challenges and Opportunities
Location: Oxford, United Kingdom
05.12.2019
Are Equity Crowdfunding Investors Active Investors?
University of Hamburg, Law, Finance, and Technology Seminar
Location: Hamburg
28.11.2019
Schöne neue Finanzwelt
University of Bremen, Netzwerken von, für und mit Alumni
Location: Bremen
21.11.2019
Are Equity Crowdfunding Investors Active Investors?
Hochschule Bremen
Location: Bremen
19.11.2019
Ökonomische Einführung
WM Praxisforum Recht der FinTechs Rechtsfragen zu Regulierung, Transaktionen und Kapitalanlageprodukten
Location: Frankfurt am Main
18.11.2019
Paralyzed by Shock and Confused by Glut: The Portfolio Formation Behavior of Peer-to-business Lending Investors
Radboud University, Seminar-Talk
Location: Nijmegen, The Netherlands
07.11.2019
Regulators to the Rescue – What Fears and Interests to Regulators Have to Reconcile?
Hamburg FinTech Week, Don’t Be Afraid of the German Angst
Location: Hamburg
24.10.2019
Verändern Bitcoin, Libra und staatliche Kryptowährungen die Finanzwelt?
SCE and the Hochschule Munich, 2. FinTech Meetup
Location: Munich
23.10.2019
Can Television Reduce Xenophobia? The Case of East Germany
University of Bremen, Diginomics Lunchtime Seminar
Location: Bremen
27.09.2019
How Do Banks Interact With FinTechs? Forms of Alliances and Their Impact on Bank Value
26th Annual Meeting of the German Finance Association
Location: Duisburg
12.08.2019
FinTechs - Market Overview Germany
Deutsche Bundesbank, Expert Panel - FinTechs and Their Impact on Central Banking
Location: Frankfurt am Main
25.07.2019
FinTech
Finance Technology Transaction, Panel Discussion
Location: Munich
17.06.2019
Crowdsourced Innovation: How Community Managers Affect Crowd Activities
University of Bielefeld
Location: Bielefeld
06.06.2019
Paralyzed by Shock and Confused by Glut: The Portfolio Formation Behavior of Peer-to-business Lending Investors
University of Marburg
Location: Marburg
23.05.2019
Paralyzed by Shock and Confused by Glut: The Portfolio Formation Behavior of Peer-to-business Lending Investors
SKEMA Business School (Nice Campus), Conference on Fintech & Digital Finance
Location: Nice, France
10.05.2019
Neue Digitale Akteure und ihre Rolle in der Finanzwirtschaft
Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband (vzbv), Seminar - Banken aktuell
Location: Berlin
01.04.2019
Fintech Adoption and Economic Behavior: Where Do We Stand?
University of Strasbourg, LaRGE Research Center, Workshop
Location: Strasbourg, France
28.03.2019
Paralyzed by Shock and Confused by Glut: The Portfolio Formation Behavior of Peer-to-business Lending Investors
Free University of Bozen, Brown Bag Seminar
Location: Bolzano, Italy
26.03.2019
Paralyzed by Shock and Confused by Glut: The Portfolio Formation Behavior of Peer-to-Business Lending Investores
University of St. Gallen, Finance Research Seminar
Location: St. Gallen, Switzerland
25.03.2019
Ökonomische Einführung
WM Praxisforum Recht der FinTechs Rechtsfragen zu Regulierung, Transaktionen und Kapitalanlageprodukten
Location: Berlin
25.03.2019
Finanzierung und Bezahlen ohne Bank
University of Bremen, Neujahrsempfang der Unifreunde
Location: Bremen
24.02.2019
How Do Banks Interact With FinTechs? Forms of Alliances and Their Impact on Bank Value
Johann Wolfgang Goethe Universität Frankfurt, Europäischer Stabilitätsmechanismus (ESM) und Institute for Monetary and Financial Stability (IMFS), EBI Global Annual Conference on Banking Regulation
Location: Frankfurt am Main
21.01.2019
Bezahlen und Finanzieren im digitalen Zeitalter
University of Bremen, Neujahrsempfang der Unifreunde
Location: Bremen
13.11.2018
Finanzierung und Bezahlen ohne Bank
University of Bremen, Chief Breakfast
Location: Bremen
07.11.2018
Paralyzed by Shock and Confused by Glut: The Portfolio Formation Behavior of Peer-to-Business Lending Investores
Kyung Hee University Seoul
Location: Seoul, South Korea
05.11.2018
Initial Coin Offerings as a New Way of Financing
Shanghai University
Location: Shanghai, China
30.10.2018
Ökonomische Einführung
WM Regulatory Meets FinTech
Location: Eschborn
24.10.2018
How Do Banks Interact With FinTechs
1st International FinTech, InsurTech & Blockchain Forum
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
17./18.10.2018
Neue Digitale Akteure und ihre Rolle in der Finanzwirtschaft: Eine Analyse des deutschen Marktes unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von Datenschutzaspekten
Federmal Ministry of Education and Research of Germany
Location: Berlin
10.10.2018
How Do Banks Interact with FinTechs
The University of Luxembourg, Banque Internationale à Luxembourg (BIL) and the Luxembourg House of Financial Technology (LHoFT)
Location: Luxemburg, Luxemburg
16.07.2018
Neue Digitale Akteure und ihre Rolle in der Finanzwirtschaft: Eine Analyse des deutschen Marktes unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von Datenschutzaspekten
ifo Institut, Munich Seminars
Location: Munich
12.07.2018
Crowdsourcing Ideas Online: The Impact of Managerial Attention on Motivation the Crowd
University of Trier, IAAEU
Location: Trier
06.07.2018
FinTech in Deutschland - Marktüberblick
University of Marburg, Opening of the Zentrums für das Recht der Digitalisierung
Location: Marburg
18.06.2018
Paralyzed by Shock and Confused by Glut: The Portfolio Formation Behavior of Peer-to-Business Lending Investores
Lyon Business School, Paris Campus, Second Workshop on Financial Literacy and Entrepreneurship
Location: Paris, France
06.06.2018
Initial Coin Offerings, Information Disclosure, and Frau Cases
Lyon Business School, Lyon Campus, Workshop Developments in Entrepreneurial Finance. Crowdfunding, Blockchain, and ICOs
Location: Lyon, France
04.06.2018
Equity Crowdfunding in Germany and the UK: Follow-Up Funding and Firm Survival
University of Essex
Location: Essex, UK
03.05.2018
FinTech - Die Revolution der Finanzwirtschaft?
University of Bremen, Inaugural Lecture
Location: Bremen
02.05.2018
The Impact of Two Different Economic Systems on Dishonesty and Charitable Giving: Determinants of Group-Level Variation
University of Hamburg, Hamburg Lecture in Law and Economics
Location: Hamburg
17.04.2018
Neue Digitale Akteure und ihre Rolle in der Finanzwirtschaft: Eine Analyse des deutschen Marktes unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von Datenschutzaspekten
University of Münster
Location: Münster
22.02.2018
How FinTech Could Impact the Financial System in the EU
European Central Bank, ESCB Monitoring Working Group
Location: Frankfurt am Main
19.02.2018
FinTechs - Market Overview Germany
German Bundesbank, International Central Banking Course: Digital Financial Innovations
Location: Frankfurt am Main
06.02.2018
The Impact of Two Different Economic Systems on Dishonesty and Charitable Giving: Determinants of Group-Level Variation
Zeppelin University
Location: Friedrichshafen
02.11.2017
Die Zukunft des Banking
Forum "Digital"
Location: Hanover
12.10.2017
Fintech: Revolution der Finanzdienstleistungen?
Vortrag zum 10. Jahrestag des Lehrstuhls für Betriebswirtschaftslehre, insbesondere Finanzierung, Universität Regensburg
Location: Regensburg
29.09.2017
Podiumsdiskussion
RWS-Forum PSD II - Die neue Zahlugnsdiensterichtlinie
Location: Cologne
22.09.2017
Session II: Fostering Stable and Inclusive Financial Systems
15th Meeting of the Central Banks and Monetary Authorities of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) Member Countries
Location: Bodrum, Turkey
18.09.2017
Quo vadis FinTechs - Die Revolution im Zahlungsverkehr? Ergebnisse der BMF-Studie zum deutschen FinTech-Markt
Keynote Speech, Alvara Innovationstage
Location: Leipzig
06.09.2017
Disentangling Crowdfunding from Crowdfunding
Jahrestagung des Verein für Socialpolitik, Poster Session
Location: Vienna, Austria
23.08.2017
Disentangling Crowdfunding from Crowdfunding
European Economic Association
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
22.08.2017
The Impact of Two Different Economic Systems on Dishonesty and Charitable Giving: Determinants of Group-Level Variation
European Economic Assocation
Location: University of Lisbon, Portugal
27.07.2017
The Economic Impact of Forming a Societas Europaea
World Finance Conference
Location: Cagliarli, Italy
27.07.2017
Market Standards in Financial Contracting: The Euro's Effect on Choice of Law in European Debt Securities
World Finance Conference
Location: Cagliarli, Italy
27.07.2017
Does a Local Bias Exist in Equity Crowdfunding?
World Finance Conference
Location: Cagliarli, Italy
07.07.2017
Marketplace Lending of SMEs
2nd Entrepreneurial Finance Conference
Location: Vlerick Business School, Belgium
16.06.2017
Does A Local Bias Exist in Equity Crowdfunding?
Location: Skema Business School, France
08.06.2017
The Economic Impact of Forming a European Company
79th Annual Meeting of the VHB
Location: University St. Gallen, Switzerland
08.06.2017
The Emergence of the Global FinTech Market: Economic and Technological Determinants
79th Annual Meeting of the VHB
Location: University St. Gallen, Switzerland
30.05.2017
Disentangling Crowdfunding from Fraudfunding
Poster Session, Munich Summer Institute 2017, Bavarian Academy of Sciences and Humanities
Location: Munich
19.05.2017
The Economic Impact of Forming a European Company
Business Law Workshops
Location: Oxford University, UK
12.05.2017
The Economic Impact of Forming a European Company
Annual Meeting of the American Law and Economics Association
Location: Yale Law School, New Haven, CT
26.04.2017
Der deutsche FinTech-Markt
Keynote Speech, FinMeetsTech
Location: Frankfurt/Main
10.04.2017
The Impact of Two Different Economic Systems on Dishonesty and Charitable Giving: Determinants of Group-Level Variation
Royal Economic Society Conference
Location: University of Bristol
26.01.2017
Crowdfunding - Potential Benefits and Risks
G20 Conference: Digitising finance, financial inclusion and financial literacy
Location: Schloss Biebrich, Wiesbaden
17.12.2016
Should Securities Regulation Promote Equity Crowdfunding?
Goethe/Penn Conference on Law and Finance
Location: Goethe University Frankfurt
08.10.2016
The (True) Legacy of Two Really Existing Economic Systems
Subjective Survey Data in Labour Market Research
Location: Institute for Labour Law and Industrial Relations in the European Union, Trier University
06.10.2016
Chancen für Banken durch Co-Creation mit Fintechs
Digital Finance Berlin Konferenz - Offene Banking Plattform – so bauen Banken Ihren eigenen Fintech-Supermarkt
Location: Berlin School of Digital Business, Berlin
21.06.2016
Pricing the Value of Cash Flow Rights in Crowdinvesting: An Analysis of Innovestment Backers
Munich Summer Institute 2016
Location: Bavarian Academy of Sciences and Humanities, Munich
06.06.2016
Portal Design and Funding Dynamics in Crowdinvesting 3rd International ZEW
Conference on the Dynamics of Entrepreneurship
Location: Centre for European Economic Research, Mannheim
02.06.2016
FinTech - Bit Coins and friends, the digital revolution in financial services- Sind Banken die Verlierer?
11. Internationale-Konferenz zu Finanzdienstleistungen, Podiumsdiskussion
Location: Institute for Financial Services, Hamburg
26.05.2016
The Economic Impact of Forming a Societas Europaea Rom Conference on Past and Future of Corporate Governance: Practices, Reforms and Regulations
Location: Roma Tre University, Rome
12.05.2016
The Economic Impact of Forming a Societas Europaea What Does Co-determination Do? What Can We Learn from Research?
Location: Social Science Center, Berlin
10.05.2016
The Economic Impact of Forming a Societas Europaea
Location: IAAEU, Trier University
19.02.2016
The (True) Legacy of Two Really Existing Economic Systems
8. Ökonomischer Workshop
Location: IAAEU, Trier University
18.02.2016
Leadership and Persistency in Spontaneous Dishonesty Workshop on the Autonomy at Work and Employee Involvement: Causes and Consequences
Location: IAB, Nuremberg
23.01.2016
Chancen für eine Grüne Wirtschaft Diskussionsforum KMU/Gründungen
Location: Economic Congress, Gelsenkirchen
23.11.2015
Understanding Investor Behavior in Crowdinvesting
EBS Research Colloquium
Location: European Business School, Oestrich-Winkel
23.10.2015
Pricing the Value of Cash Flow Rights in Crowdinvesting: An Analysis of Innovestment Backers
3. Crowdinvesting Symposium
Location: LMU Munich
16.10.2015
Surprising Persistency in Spontaneous Dishonesty
Workshop on Experimental Labour and Personnel Economics
Location: Institute for Labour Law and Industrial Relations in the European Union, Trier University
05.10.2015
Regulatory Approach to Crowdfunding Corporate Acquisitions and Access to Entrepreneurial Financing in the Post-Accession Era
Location: Jean Monnet Inter-University Centre of Excellence, Opatija
01.10.2015
Funding Dynamics in Crowdinvesting
Location: Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition, Munich
11.09.2015
Funding Dynamics in Crowdinvesting
John Molson School of Business
Location: Concordia University, Montréal
20.08.2015
Market Standards in Financial Contracting: The Euro’s Effect on Choice of Law in European Debt Securities
Annual Meeting of the European Finance Association
Location: Vienna University of Economics and Business
23.07.2015
Crowdinvesting - Regulatorisches und VC-Kompatibilität Finance Technology Transaction
Location: Munich
25.06.2015
Funding Dynamics in Crowdinvesting
Annual Meeting of the European Financial Management Association
Location: Nyenrode New Business School
15.06.2015
Fraud in Financial Markets: Insights from Law & Economics and Behavioral Science Finance, Ethics and Society
Location: University of Oslo
02.06.2015
Should Securities Regulation Promotes Crowdinvesting?
Workshop on the Economics of Entrepreneurship and Innovation
Location: Trier University
02.06.2015
Funding Dynamics in Crowdinvesting
Workshop on the Economics of Entrepreneurship and Innovation
Location: Trier University
15.05.2015
The (True) Legacy of Two Really Existing Economic Systems
Annual Meeting of the American Law and Economics Association
Location: Columbia Law School, New York
25.02.2015
Investment Behavior in Crowdinvesting
Law and Economics Forum
Location: London School of Economics and Political Science, London
20.02.2015
Investment Behavior in Crowdinvesting
7. Ökonomische Workshop
Location: Trier University
04.02.2015
Investment Behavior in Crowdinvesting
Location: Center for Advanced Studies in Law and Economics, University of Bonn
29.01.2015
Moral Psychology, Jurisprudence, and Human Rights
Location: Center for Advanced Studies, LMU Munich
11.12.2014
Investment Behavior in Crowdinvesting
Location: Philipps-Universität Marburg
23.11.2014
Regulating Crowdinvesting
Location: Peking University, Peking
06.11.2014
Which Securities Regulation Promotes Crowdinvesting?
Conference on Financial Regulation and Competition
Location: Centre for European Economic Research, Mannheim
19.09.2014
Which Securities Regulation Promotes Crowdinvesting?
31th Annual Meeting of the European Association of Law and Economics
Location: Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille
04.07.2014
Funding Dynamics in Crowdinvesting
Zweites Crowdinvesting Symposium
Location: LMU Munich
04.07.2014
Marktentwicklungen und Regulierungsperspektiven in Europa
Zweites Crowdinvesting Symposium
Location: LMU Munich
22.05.2014
Empirische Ergebnisse zur Wirksamkeit horizontalen Regulierungswettbewerbs
Wettbewerb der Gesellschaftsrechtsordnungen in Ostmitteleuropa?
Location: Andrássy University, Budapest
24.03.2014
The (True) Legacy of the German Reunification: How Some Dishonest West Germans Made East Germans Cheat More (Even Today)
Location: Center for Advanced Hindsight, Duke University, Durham
13.01.2014
Can Network Effects Impede Optimal Contracting in Debt Securities?
Finance Group Research Seminar
Location: Skema Business School Lille, Lille
26.11.2013
Can Network Effects Impede Optimal Contracting in Debt Securities?
LawEcon Workshop
Location: Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Bonn
30.10.2013
Mitarbeiterbetrug in der Finanzwirtschaft – Die Bedeutung des Rechts und der Verhaltensökonomik Institut für Arbeitsrecht und Arbeitsbeziehungen in der Europäischen Union
Location: Trier University
28.09.2013
Can Network Effects Impede Optimal Contracting in Debt Securities?
20. Jahrestagung der German Finance Association
Location: University of Wuppertal
07.09.2013
Funding Dynamics in Crowdinvesting
Jahrestagung des Verein für Socialpolitik
Location: University of Münster
07.09.2013
Can Network Effects Impede Optimal Contracting in Debt Securities? Jahrestagung des Verein für Socialpolitik
Location: University of Düsseldorf
18.06.2013
Cheating Across Cultures Summer Institute on Bounded Rationality
Location: Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin
06.05.2013
Can Network Effects Impede Optimal Contracting in Debt Securities?
CESifo Group Seminar
Location: LMU Munich
29.04.2013
Can Network Effects Impede Optimal Contracting in Debt Securities?
Public Economics Seminar
Location: LMU Munich
16.02.2013
Can Network Effects Impede Optimal Contracting in Debt Securities?
Annual Conference of the Mannheim Centre for Competition and Innovation (MaCCI)
Location: Centre for European Economic Research, Mannheim
08.02.2013
Überblick über den deutschen Crowdinvesting-Markt
Erstes Crowdinvesting Symposium
Location: LMU Munich
19.12.2012
Crowdinvesting und die Neue Institutionenökonomik
Gastvorlesung – Einführung in die Betriebswirtschaftslehre
Location: RWTH Aachen
19.12.2012
Crowdinvesting in Deutschland – Markt, Rechtslage und Regulierungsperspektiven
Technology and Innovation Management Seminar
Location: RWTH Aachen
26.11.2012
Can Network Effects Impede Optimal Contracting in Debt Securities?
Location: House of Finance, Goethe University Frankfurt
08.10.2012
Can Network Effects Impede Optimal Contracting in Debt Securities?
Law and Business Workshop
Location: Vanderbilt University, Nashville
06.06.2012
Verhandlung der Arbeitnehmermitbestimmung: Eine Analyse der Verhandlungen über Mitbestimmungsvereinbarungen bei der Europäischen Aktiengesellschaft (SE)
Workshop Privatrecht
Location: LMU Munich
18.05.2012
Preliminary References - Analyzing the Determinants that Made the ECJ the Powerful Court It Is
22nd Annual Meeting of the American Law and Economics Association
Location: Stanford University, Stanford
24.03.2012
Gericht oder Konfliktmanagementcenter: Quo vadis, Iustitia?
15. Mediations-Kongress
Location: LMU Munich
28.10.2011
Preliminary References - Analyzing the Determinants that Made the ECJ the Powerful Court It Is
9th Annual Conference of the German Law & Economics Association
Location: University of Bonn
24.09.2011
Reputation und Netzwerk als Schlüssel zum Markt
Konfliktmanagement-Kongress 2011
Location: Ministry of Justice of Lower-Saxony, Hanover
23.09.2011
Preliminary References - Analyzing the Determinants that Made the ECJ the Powerful Court It Is
28th Annual Conference of the European Law & Economics Association
Location: University of Hamburg
22.09.2011
Does Charter Competition Foster Entrepreneurship? A Difference-in-Difference Approach to European Company Law Reforms
28th Annual Conference of the European Law & Economics Association
Location: University of Hamburg
27.01.2011
Where Do Firms Issue Debt? An Empirical Analysis of Issuer Location and Regulatory Competition in the European Corporate Debt Market Law and Finance Seminar Series
Location: University of Oxford
10.12.2010
Where Do Firms Incorporate Now? National Company Law Reform and the Market for Incorporations
6th Annual Conference of the Italian Law & Economics Society
Location: Free University of Bozen-Bolzano
03.12.2010
Where Do Firms Incorporate Now? National Company Law Reform and the Market for Incorporations
8th Annual Conference of the German Law & Economics Association
Location: European Business School, Oestrich-Winkel
11.10.2010
Where Do Firms Issue Debt? An Empirical Analysis of Issuer Location and Regulatory Competition in the European Corporate Debt Market
Law and Economics Workshop
Location: University of California, Berkeley
18.08.2010
Where Do Firms Incorporate Now? National Company Law Reform and the Market for Incorporations Center for Financial Studies / Program in Law and Economics of Money and Finance Summer School
Location: House of Finance, Goethe University, Frankfurt
25.03.2010
Where Do Firms Issue Debt? An Empirical Analysis of Issuer Location and Regulatory Competition in the European Corporate Debt Market
XII. Travemünder Symposium zur ökonomischen Analyse des Rechts
Location: University of Hamburg
19.04.2010
Where Do Firms Issue Debt? An Empirical Analysis of Issuer Location and Regulatory Competition in the European Corporate Debt Market
Public Economics Seminar
Location: LMU Munich
04.12.2009
Issuing Bonds Under Her Majesty’s Laws: Regulatory Competition in the European Corporate Bond Market
7th Annual Conference of the German Law & Economics Association
Location: Trier University
28.04.2009
The Societas Europaea: Good News for European Firms
Empirical Economics Research Workshop
Location: LMU Munich
28.11.2008
Incorporating Under European Law: The SE as a Vehicle for Legal Arbitrage
6th Annual Conference of the German Law & Economics Association
Location: University of Innsbruck
18.10.2006
Sportwetten am Wendepunkt
Dowjones Newswires Workshop
Location: Frankfurt Stock Exchange