Mythbusting Empirical Research
8:30 - 10:00 a.m., Prof. Karin Hoisl, Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition, Munich, Room 225
Brown Bag Seminar: Competition, Patents and Innovation
Susanne Prantl (University of Cologne, Department of Economics)
Institute Seminar
1:30 - 3:00 p.m., Dr. Jesus Ivan Mora Gonzalez, Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition, Munich, Room E10
Brown Bag Seminar: The Co-Alignment of Open Innovation With Environmental Contingencies and Its Effect on Innovation Performance
John Hagedoorn (Maastricht University)
By linking an open innovation perspective and a contingency view, this paper contributes to the open innovation literature in two ways. First, answering the recent call of scholars, we bring environmental context into open innovation research. In line with a ‘fit as moderation’ perspective we claim that some environmental contingencies might be favorable for searching broadly, but less favorable for searching deeply. To the best of our knowledge this is the first empirical study that explicitly focuses on specific contingencies in the external environment that shape firms’ ability to benefit from open innovation. Second, rather than treating search openness as a homogeneous construct, we explicitly focus on the differential effects of breadth and depth on firms’ innovation performance. As we will show, this approach delivers a more fine-grained understanding of how contingencies affect the value of external search breadth and depth and their differential impact on innovation performance.
Trade Mark Functions and Trade Mark Rights
8:30 a.m., Prof. Miquel Peguera, Max Planck Institute for Tax Law and Public Finance, Munich, Marstallstrasse 8, Room 512
Statutory Domain and the Commercial Law of Intellectual Property: Understanding the U.S. Exhaustion Doctrine
2:00 - 3:30 p.m., Prof. John F. Duffy, Max Planck Institute for Tax Law and Public Finance, Munich, Marstallstrasse 8, Room 220
Brown Bag Seminar: Monetary Incentives for Corporate Inventors
Koichiro Onishi (Osaka Institute of Technology, Faculty of Intellectual Property)
Using a novel panel data set of Japanese inventors, we investigate how monetary incentives affect corporate inventors' behavior and performance. Furthermore, we analyze how these incentives interact with intrinsic motivation. Our findings are as follows: (1) While introducing or raising revenue-based payments is associated with higher patent quality, such schemes decrease the number of citations to non-patent literature; (2) the strength of intrinsic motivation - measured by the importance of the inventors’ interest in contributing to the advancement of science (“taste for science” hereafter) - raises the inventors' patent productivity; and (3) the taste for science weakens the marginal effect of monetary incentives on inventive productivity, and further reinforces the negative effect of monetary incentives on the inventors’ backward citations from non-patent literature.
Hat das Trennungsprinzip eine Zukunft?
1:30 - 3:00 p.m., Dr. Peter Meier-Beck, Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition, Munich, Room E10
[IP]² Seminar: Patent Monetisation at Fraunhofer Society
1:30 - 3:00 p.m., Dr. Christian Schamper, Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition, Munich, Room E10
Brown Bag Seminar: Technology Entry in the Presence of Patent Thickets
Bronwyn Hall (University of California, Berkeley)
We present an empirical analysis of the effects of patent thickets at the European Patent Office on entry into patenting by UK firms. Using a direct measure of patent thicket density, we provide evidence for the existence and growth of patent thickets in specific industries, notably in telecommunications, audiovisual technology, and computer technology. Our analysis indicates that the density of patent thickets is associated with reduced entry into patenting in the particular technology area (controlling for the level of patenting in that area). We find this effect to be particularly pronounced for electronics and telecommunications. It is also stronger for smaller than for large companies.